How Do You Set the Integration Limits for x and y in a Cone's Volume Integral?

geft
Messages
144
Reaction score
0
I have the cone x^2 + y^2 <= z^2 with |z| <= 2
The vector function F = (4x, 3z, 5y)

With the divergence theorem I managed to reduce the equation to
∫∫∫ 4 dxdydz

Now the problem is finding out the limits. I know z goes from 0 to 2, but what about x and y?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
geft said:
I have the cone x^2 + y^2 <= z^2 with |z| <= 2
The vector function F = (4x, 3z, 5y)

With the divergence theorem I managed to reduce the equation to
∫∫∫ 4 dxdydz

Now the problem is finding out the limits. I know z goes from 0 to 2, but what about x and y?

You haven't stated the problem. Are you calculating a flux integral? You might try writing your volume integral in cylindrical coordinates.
 
The question asks to evaluate ∫F.ndA by the divergence theorem. I can just take a shortcut and use the general formula for cone volume, but I was wondering if there are known limits for the integrals.
 
geft said:
The question asks to evaluate ∫F.ndA by the divergence theorem. I can just take a shortcut and use the general formula for cone volume, but I was wondering if there are known limits for the integrals.

Of course there are. Integrate z first from z on the cone to z on the top and use polar coordinates for the dxdy integral. That is why I suggested cylindrical coordinates.
 
Your integral is very simple and can be evaluated without explicitly determining the limits of each integral. (Hint: what is the integral of dV of a cone over the entire volume of the cone?)
 
geft said:
The question asks to evaluate ∫F.ndA by the divergence theorem. I can just take a shortcut and use the general formula for cone volume, but I was wondering if there are known limits for the integrals.

SteamKing said:
Your integral is very simple and can be evaluated without explicitly determining the limits of each integral. (Hint: what is the integral of dV of a cone over the entire volume of the cone?)

Apparently he already knows that.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top