How Do You Solve a Double Atwood Machine Problem with Unequal Masses?

AI Thread Summary
To solve a double Atwood machine problem with unequal masses, the net force is calculated using the equation F = 8g - 3g - 2g, resulting in a net force of 3g. The total mass of the system is 13 kg, leading to an acceleration of approximately 2.26 m/s². Free-body diagrams (FBD) for masses m1 and m2 have been drawn, but assistance is needed for m3, which does not tilt. Tensions in the strings must also be considered for a complete analysis. It is noted that the setup described is more akin to a standard Atwood machine rather than a double Atwood machine.
dsfrankl
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If the masses for a double Atwood machine similar to the own shown in the attached picture are m1=2.0kg, m2=3.0kg, and m3=8.0kg: (a) what is the magnitude of the acceleration of the system and (b) how would you draw free-body diagrams for this problem?

NOTE: m3 does not tilt. Also, two strings will have two tensions.

Homework Equations


F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


I found the net force by using: F=8g-3g-2g=3g. Then I added the masses to get 13kg. a=F/m=3g/13kg=2.26m/s^2. The problem however, is that I know my professor won't take this. She'll want to see drawings of FBD first (which I managed to draw FBD for m1 and m2 but am not sure how to draw m3), and for me to use tensions as well. I'm not really sure how to do it that way.
 

Attachments

  • atwood.png
    atwood.png
    12 KB · Views: 865
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dsfrankl said:
I found the net force by using: F=8g-3g-2g=3g.
This is the net force on what?

dsfrankl said:
which I managed to draw FBD for m1 and m2
So what did the free body diagrams for m1 and m2 tell you?

dsfrankl said:
am not sure how to draw m3
What forces act on ##m_3##?

Furthermore, think about what correlations among the accelerations of the masses that you can write down.

Also note that this is not what would typically be called a double Atwood machine. This is a double Atwood machine:
image015.jpg

What you have is actually equivalent to a normal Atwood machine.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top