How Do You Solve a Momentum Conservation Problem When Stuck?

  • Thread starter Thread starter VHAHAHA
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impulse Strange
VHAHAHA
Messages
58
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem is shown below.

Homework Equations



Conservation of momentum? pi = pf
∫Fdt = I ?

The Attempt at a Solution



This question is really strange. I have started to do this question for many hours and I don't know how to start it.

I have tried to list out the equations like Conservation of momentum and ∫Fdt = I , but i don't know how to use this equation! It is very strange ! How to get start? I have also tried using the center of mass but the results are useless!

Any tips pleases? I have already attempted this equation! But the problem is I don't know how to get start! =(
 

Attachments

  • Q.png
    Q.png
    16.5 KB · Views: 452
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to use the momentum equation: change of the momentum of the CM is equal to the impulse, and the similar equation for the change of angular momentum, which is equal to the angular impulse ∫τdt,integral of the torque of the applied force. The frame will move as a whole in the direction of the blow and at the same time, rotate about the CM. Knowing the velocity of the CM and the angular velocity with respect to the CM you get the velocity of B.

ehild
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top