How Do You Solve Electric Circuit Problems with Multiple Voltage Sources?

AI Thread Summary
Understanding how to solve electric circuit problems with multiple voltage sources involves applying Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) correctly. When analyzing the circuit, it is crucial to determine whether you are "walking uphill" or "walking downhill" between nodes, as this affects the signs of the voltage values. The relationship between Uab and Uba is that Uab equals -Uba, indicating the importance of direction in voltage measurements. Confusion often arises from the signs associated with voltage drops across resistors, which should align with the current's direction according to Ohm's law. Properly accounting for these factors will lead to accurate calculations of resistance and voltage in complex circuits.
alexmath
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://iceimg.com/i/2a/b2/df5d993eb7.png

Homework Equations


Sorry for the big picture...

The Attempt at a Solution


Every time i see more then 1 generator i get in trouble... i don't understand here when to add and when to substruct voltages. Is there any difference between Uab and Uba...

For the first one i get R=29 which is wrong.
-15V-I(2+R)+6=18
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
alexmath said:
Every time i see more then 1 generator i get in trouble... i don't understand here when to add and when to substruct voltages. Is there any difference between Uab and Uba...
Yes, Uab = -Uba. Look at it as a KVL "walk" from one node to another. In one case you're "walking downhill", dropping overall in potential from +18V to 0V, and in the other case "walking uphill" from 0V to +18V.
For the first one i get R=29 which is wrong.
-15V-I(2+R)+6=18

I think you'll find that the above resolves to R = -29 Ohms, which is clearly not a physically correct value for resistance (at least not at this course level :smile:).

Are you "walking uphill" or "walking downhill" overall in this problem?
 
So, the first one should be:
18v-15v+6v=I(2+R)

second one:
If i go from + to - will be a negative sign, but the current is going to the left, and I'm going to the right... so it will be 18V+30 or 18V-30V

signes are so confusing to me :(
 
alexmath said:
So, the first one should be:
18v-15v+6v=I(2+R)
Yes, that looks fine.
second one:
If i go from + to - will be a negative sign, but the current is going to the left, and I'm going to the right... so it will be 18V+30 or 18V-30V

signes are so confusing to me :(

If you pencil in the signs of the voltage drops across the resistors according to the current direction first, it should make it easier to assemble your terms when you do your "KVL walk" along the path. The signs of the drops will respect the current's effect according to Ohm's law.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top