How Do You Solve Exponents Like X^3 + X^5 = 0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nightanole
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponents
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equation x^3 + x^5 = 0, with participants breaking it down into factors like x^3(1 + x^2) = 0. The solutions emerge as x^3 = 0 or 1 + x^2 = 0, leading to x = 0 as one solution and x = -1 from another equation. Participants emphasize the importance of recognizing that if a product equals zero, at least one factor must also equal zero. The conversation highlights the challenges of recalling mathematical rules and the occasional mental blocks that can occur when solving problems. Overall, the thread illustrates the process of factoring and solving polynomial equations.
nightanole
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Well it appears that as i get higher in math, i lose the stuff i learned awhile ago. This type has me stumped for some reason.


x^3 + X^5=0 Or another one X^3 + x^4=0

I can break them down to X^3(1+X^2)=0 or X^3(X +1)=0

I just can seem to solve these simple guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure where you're having problems.

x3+x5=0
x3(1 + x2)=0
x3=0 or 1 + x2=0
x=0 (Assuming you only want real solutions)
 
Hmm found something but can't explain the rule (help explaining please)

Got it to X^3(1+X)=0

for some reason you break it down to 2 solutions
x^3=0 and 1+x=0

since the first one doesn't work, the second one is the answer, which i can solve. X=-1
 
nightanole said:
Hmm found something but can't explain the rule (help explaining please)

Got it to X^3(1+X)=0

for some reason you break it down to 2 solutions
x^3=0 and 1+x=0

since the first one doesn't work, the second one is the answer, which i can solve. X=-1
The first one solves for x=0
 
If a*b=0 then it is obvious that either a=0, b=0 or a and b=0. So you need to look at both a being 0 or b being 0. This is why in general in maths we like things to equal 0 so we can solve them. For example a*b=1 doesn't tell us anything about a or b.
 
Thanks guys, due to a brain fart this problem took me like 30min because i didnt factor, then i couldn't remember the zero thing till about 10min ago. I thought I am gona be a garbage man after this simple brain freeze. Last brain freeze was adding two digit number:)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top