Engineering How Do You Solve for Voltage U in a Simple DC Circuit with Series Components?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving for voltage U in a simple DC circuit with series components, specifically involving a voltage source U_0, a resistor R, and a current source I_0. The user initially applied Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and derived U = R*I_0 - U_0, but the answer key states U = R*I_0 + U_0, leading to confusion over the signs of the voltages. Clarifications were sought regarding the treatment of voltages across ideal current sources and the orientation of voltage sources, particularly in relation to circuit polarity. The user also explored the implications of reversing the current source's direction on the voltage calculations. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the importance of accurately understanding component polarities and their effects on circuit analysis.
Zrpeip
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone, first post.
Just wanted to say I've been using parts of this forum for a long time for help in understanding all kinds of concepts, and have found it immensely helpful over the years. Thank you for all of your contributions!
So, here goes with my hopefully very simple question:

Homework Statement



From a practice exam with answer key.
Written: 'What is the value of the voltage U?'
The drawing: a simple closed loop with 3 circuit elements in series (from top to bottom on one side): an ideal voltage source U_0 (positive terminal 'on top'), a resistor R, and an ideal current source I_0 (current emerges 'on top').
The voltage in question U appears across two terminal legs placed above and below the ideal current source, and has the same orientation as the voltage source (i.e. positive terminal 'on top').
I've attached a picture as well.


Homework Equations



I used KVL in the main loop (clockwise):
-U_0 + R*I_0 -U = 0


The Attempt at a Solution



The above equation gave me my solution, or so I thought. U = R*I_0 - U_0.
However, the listed solution is U = R*I_0 + U_0.

I would assume that R*I_0 and U_0, written symbolically as they are in this problem, could never have the same sign (following the KVL loop and polarities).

But I don't feel that I understand how to treat voltages across ideal current sources anyway. So perhaps my problem is there. I would appreciate any explanation of how to approach that in general as well.

I'm still a beginner and make dumb mistakes in circuit analysis all the time and root most of them out eventually, but for whatever reason I'm not getting it here. I think I've overthought it. Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • Voltage across ideal current source.PNG
    Voltage across ideal current source.PNG
    1.6 KB · Views: 555
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to draw the circuit in this way
 

Attachments

  • Voltage across ideal current source.PNG
    Voltage across ideal current source.PNG
    3 KB · Views: 570
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks for your reply, Jony130 :-) The drawing is helpful to me, didn't even think of redrawing it. Now I have a new technique to use when I get stuck.

But even after trying that, I (think I) still have the same question.

Let me write out how I'm thinking about it from your drawing:
For KVL loop in main loop, I make my loop clockwise starting between the resistor and voltage source:
Voltage across voltage source: -U_0
Voltage across terminals (voltage across current source): -U
Voltage across resistor: +R*I_0
Total KVL equation: -U_0 + R*I_0 -U = 0
Add U to both sides, I get my answer: U = R*I_0 MINUS U_0

The solution in the answer key: U = R*I_0 PLUS U_0
Both R*I_0 and U_0 in the final equation are positive and I don't see why yet.

(sorry for the bolding, I don't want to be rude but I just wanted to make my question clearer)
Thanks
 
I mark the component polarities

attachment.php?attachmentid=67167&stc=1&d=1393770251.png


So we have Uo - U + Io*R = 0


Or

- Uo + U - Io*R = 0
 

Attachments

  • source.PNG
    source.PNG
    1.8 KB · Views: 522
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you again :-)
I'm in Germany and here, as far as I know, the arrow on a voltage source is actually opposite polarity to what you have drawn (tail at + end and tip at - end)... so we still have the same problem.
 
You mark the direction of a current source in clockwise direction. And this means that the voltage at point A must be higher then the voltage at point B (Io*R higher ).
attachment.php?attachmentid=67173&stc=1&d=1393774657.png

So from this we can say that the voltage at point A is equal to:
Va = Vb + (Io*R) = Uo + VR. And the voltage at current source is
Vac = Va - Vb = (Uo + VR) - 0V = Uo + VR because we treat Vc as our reference point (GND).

But if we reverse the direction of a current source we have this situation
attachment.php?attachmentid=67172&stc=1&d=1393773853.png

And now the voltage at point A is Io*R lower then the voltage at point B.
So Vac = Vo - Io*R

Zrpeip said:
Thank you again :-)
I'm in Germany and here, as far as I know, the arrow on a voltage source is actually opposite polarity to what you have drawn (tail at + end and tip at - end)... so we still have the same problem.
In my drawings the arrow tip points to the most positive end (highest potential) of the component.
OK so for your polarity we have this situation
attachment.php?attachmentid=67174&stc=1&d=1393774670.png


We treat point C as our GND (reference point).
The voltage at point B is equal to -Vo and the voltage at point A is Io*R higher the the voltage at point b.
Vac = Vb + Io*R = -Vo + Io*R
 

Attachments

  • source2.PNG
    source2.PNG
    1.9 KB · Views: 518
  • source.PNG
    source.PNG
    2 KB · Views: 524
  • source3.PNG
    source3.PNG
    1.7 KB · Views: 561
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
984
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top