How Do You Solve ln x + ln(x+1) = 7?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vt33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Log
AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation ln x + ln(x+1) = 7, it should be rewritten as x^2 + x - e^7 = 0 instead of x^2 + x - 7 = 0. The quadratic equation can be solved using methods other than factoring, such as the quadratic formula. Calculating e^7 will provide a specific value to use in the equation. Using the quadratic formula will yield the correct solutions for x. This approach will help in finding the values of x that satisfy the original logarithmic equation.
vt33
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help me with this natural log?

ln x + ln(x+1) = 7

I've tried putting it in quadratic form but all I get is x^2 + x - 7=0
which doesn't seem to factor. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vt33 said:
Can anyone help me with this natural log?

ln x + ln(x+1) = 7

I've tried putting it in quadratic form but all I get is x^2 + x - 7=0
which doesn't seem to factor. What am I doing wrong?

For one thing, your equation is wrong. It should be x^2 + x - e^7 = 0

Second, there are methods other than factoring for solving quadratic equations.
 
I've never seen this

well, thanks but, I've never actually seen this type of equation. What do I do with the -e^7, or what I mean is how do I factor that? Actually, should I just use the quadratic formula?
 
vt33 said:
well, thanks but, I've never actually seen this type of equation. What do I do with the -e^7, or what I mean is how do I factor that? Actually, should I just use the quadratic formula?

Your calculator should be able to give you a value for e^7. I am assuming that you know what e is. Then, using the quadratic formula should give you the correct answer.
 
thanks!

I see what you mean now, so I'll go crunch the numbers! Thanks a lot :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top