How Do You Solve the Differential Equation for Particle Motion with F=kvx?

AI Thread Summary
To solve the differential equation for particle motion given by F=kvx, the equation can be rewritten in terms of velocity and position. The relationship between force, mass, and acceleration leads to the formulation k(dx/dt)x = m(d²x/dt²). The confusion arises when trying to separate variables or reduce the equation to a first-order form. Key solutions to the equation include x=0 and x=k/m, indicating potential equilibrium points. Utilizing the chain rule can help eliminate time from the equation, simplifying the problem.
infraray
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
I'm given F=kvx. I need to find x(t), k is a positive constant, and the particle passes thru the origin with speed Vo at time t=0.

I start by rewriting the formula as such:

dv/dt=k*dx/dt*x

I am confused now though because I now have dv,dt, and dx. I assume I need to get everything in terms of dx and dt. Can I use separation of variables or do I need another technique?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is v the speed?

If so, you got F=kvx, which can be rewriten as

F = k\frac{dx}{dt}x

and F = ma, which can be rewritten as

F = m\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}

Combining the two leads to

k\frac{dx}{dt}x = m\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}
 
Now is this where you have trouble? kx=mx^{2} has solutions x=0 and x=k/m. What does this tell you about the differential equation?
 
Last edited:
Ok, after some tinkering I was able to get:
k\frac{dx}{dt}x = m\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}
Since it doesn't appear to be able to be put into a 1st order equation I assume I am out of luck with seperation, or am I?

Sorry, but I'm not sure what x=0, x=k/m tells me about the equation. Are they linear dependent? The lighter the object the further it travels?

It's been over 2 years since diff eq and my head is a mess right now. I feel helpless. My teacher keeps saying this is easy, but when you've been away from it for a while, it is very hard. It's not like riding a bike that's for sure.
 
Try using the fact (chain rule) that
\frac{dv}{dt}= \frac{dv}{dx}\frac{dx}{dt}= v\frac{dv}{dx}
to eliminate t from the equation.

m\frac{dv}{dt}= mv\frac{dv}{dx}= F= kxv
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top