How Do You Structure a Paraboloid as a Smooth Manifold?

  • Thread starter Thread starter franznietzsche
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Manifolds Smooth
AI Thread Summary
To structure the paraboloid y_{3}=(y_{1})^2+(y_{2})^2 as a smooth manifold, one must define a smooth atlas consisting of charts that cover the manifold with smooth transition functions. The topological structure is established by considering the paraboloid as a subset of Euclidean space, where open sets are defined as intersections with open sets in that space. Two charts can be defined: one for y_{1} > 0 and another for y_{1} < 0, ensuring coverage of the entire paraboloid with overlapping domains. The identity function serves as the transition function between these charts in the overlapping region. This approach successfully gives the paraboloid the structure of a smooth manifold.
franznietzsche
Messages
1,503
Reaction score
6
i am trying to solve this problem:

Give the paraboloid y_{3}=(y_{1})^2+(y_{2})^2 the structure of a smooth manifold.

But i am unsure what it means by structure. Can anyone give me some help here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
i kept trying to solve it on my own, but all i was able to get was:

<br /> x^1(y_{1},y_{2},y_{3})=\pm\sqrt{y_{3}-(y_{2})^2}<br />

<br /> x^2(y_{1},y_{2},y_{3})=\pm\sqrt{y_{3}-(y_{1})^2}<br />

<br /> x^3(y_{1},y_{2},y_{3})=(y_{1})^2 + (y_{2})^2<br />

is that the answer? I'm feeling very lost here.

edit:

Ok i think i figured it out...

i set the local coordinates x^1,x^2 to lie in they^1;y^3,y^2;y^3 planes respectively. thus from the above I get:

<br /> x^1(y_{1},0,y_{3})=\pm\sqrt{y_{3}}<br />

<br /> x^2(0,y_{2},y_{3})=\pm\sqrt{y_{3}}<br />

I also realized that the manifold is 2-dimensional (being embedded in E_{3}) so there is no x^3 coordinate.


If anyone can give any confirmation on this answer i would greatly appreciate it.
 
Last edited:


Sure, I can help you with this problem. To give the paraboloid the structure of a smooth manifold, we need to define a smooth atlas on it. A smooth atlas is a collection of charts that cover the entire manifold and have smooth transition functions between them.

To start, we need to define the topological structure of the paraboloid. Since the paraboloid is a subset of Euclidean space, we can use the standard topology on it. This means that open sets on the paraboloid are defined as the intersection of open sets in Euclidean space with the paraboloid.

Next, we need to define charts on the paraboloid. A chart is a map from an open set on the manifold to an open set in Euclidean space. For the paraboloid, we can use the following two charts:

Chart 1: U = {(y1, y2) | y1 > 0} --> R^2
f(y1, y2) = (y1, y2)

Chart 2: V = {(y1, y2) | y1 < 0} --> R^2
g(y1, y2) = (y1, y2)

Notice that the charts cover the entire paraboloid and their domains overlap on the boundary (y1 = 0).

Finally, we need to define the transition functions between the charts. Since the charts overlap on the boundary, we can use the identity function as the transition function between them. This means that h = g o f^-1 = (y1, y2) on the overlap region.

With these charts and transition functions, we have defined a smooth atlas on the paraboloid. This gives the paraboloid the structure of a smooth manifold. I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any other questions.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top