How Do You Take the Covariant Derivative of a Tensor Twice?

Mr-R
Messages
123
Reaction score
23
Doing some problems in D'INVERNO GR textbook and I am stuck on taking the covariant derivation of a tensor twice. Please see the attached picture and please do inform me if something is not clear :smile:
 

Attachments

  • 1404967929479.jpg
    1404967929479.jpg
    26.4 KB · Views: 461
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello.
Where do e comes from??

Take ##A^i=B^i_jC^j##.
j is a dummy index, there is a summation over j.
i can be 1, 2 or 3. This equation tells that the equality is true for all three values of i.
##A^k=B^k_jC^j## is exactly the same as ##A^i=B^i_jC^j##, you must not keep track of indices from one equation to another.
 
Heya bloby,

For e, I just chose a new tensor to represent the covariant derivative of the original tensor. Then what should I have named it? T^{a}_{b} ?

Thanks
 
Rather ##T^a_d## the same indices than LHS. The indices are related to basis element. They must be consistent within an equation, like ##v^i=\frac{dx^i}{dt}##, not ##v^i=\frac{dx^j}{dt}##. The 3rd and 4th line of the thumbnail are the same(after corrections) with renamed indices .
 
bloby said:
Rather ##T^a_d## the same indices than LHS. The indices are related to basis element. They must be consistent within an equation, like ##v^i=\frac{dx^i}{dt}##, not ##v^i=\frac{dx^j}{dt}##. The 3rd and 4th line of the thumbnail are the same(after corrections) with renamed indices .

Much Appreciated bloby :smile:

Thanks
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top