Schools How do you tell which schools are well-regarded in particular subfields?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Schools
AI Thread Summary
When selecting graduate schools, it's crucial to evaluate the research interests of faculty members, as this can significantly influence academic and career outcomes. However, undergraduates often struggle to assess the true impact of research based solely on descriptions, as faculty typically present their work positively. Seeking insights from professors at one's current institution can be beneficial, but this may be challenging if there are no specialists in the desired field. Resources like the Chronicles of Higher Education may provide valuable rankings and insights into various programs, which can assist in making informed decisions about graduate school applications. Accessing such publications through libraries can help clarify which programs are recognized for their contributions to specific research areas.
phun
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Just as the title says. Everyone tells me when deciding which schools to apply to, I should look at what kind of research the faculty members are doing and if any of them interest me. While I agree that this would be the first thing to do, I don't believe one is able to tell (as an undergrad) if the research they are describing is really making any impact in the field just by reading research descriptions. I mean, who is going to describe their research as if it is not important or well-regarded in the field? How do people go about this? I've heard someone say you need to ask the professors at your school about their opinions on different schools, but my school doesn't have anyone specializing in the field of my interest. Can anyone offer an advice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phun said:
Just as the title says. Everyone tells me when deciding which schools to apply to, I should look at what kind of research the faculty members are doing and if any of them interest me. While I agree that this would be the first thing to do, I don't believe one is able to tell (as an undergrad) if the research they are describing is really making any impact in the field just by reading research descriptions. I mean, who is going to describe their research as if it is not important or well-regarded in the field? How do people go about this? I've heard someone say you need to ask the professors at your school about their opinions on different schools, but my school doesn't have anyone specializing in the field of my interest. Can anyone offer some advice?


THere is some publication listing grad programs that should be relevant...i forget what it is offhand (just a second year).
 
Unless I imagined the whole thing, Chronicles of Higher Education used to have a ranking of different areas of physics. This periodical should be available at most large libraries. You just have to figure out which issue they do this reporting.

Zz.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top