MHB How does 12 + j16 become 20 ∠53.1° in impedance calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter portcharlotte
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impedance
AI Thread Summary
The impedance calculation converts the complex number 12 + j16 into polar form, resulting in 20 ∠53.1°. This transformation utilizes the relationships between Cartesian and polar coordinates, where r is calculated as the square root of the sum of the squares of the real and imaginary components. Specifically, r equals 20, derived from √(12² + 16²). The angle θ is found using the arctangent function, yielding approximately 53.1°. This process illustrates the conversion from rectangular to polar representation in impedance calculations.
portcharlotte
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Good morning,

I was reviewing a problem in my book regarding Impedance. I have a question. For the impedance -Z they got 20 ∠53.1° degrees How did they go from 12 + j16 to 20 ∠53.1°. Thanks

View attachment 8827
 

Attachments

  • 12.11 Text Book Need Help.JPG
    12.11 Text Book Need Help.JPG
    50.8 KB · Views: 105
Mathematics news on Phys.org
portcharlotte said:
Good morning,

I was reviewing a problem in my book regarding Impedance. I have a question. For the impedance -Z they got 20 ∠53.1° degrees How did they go from 12 + j16 to 20 ∠53.1°. Thanks

Hi portcharlotte, welcome to MHB! ;)

Every imaginary number has a cartesian representation and a polar representation.
The relation between $x+jy$ and $r∠\theta$ is given by $r=\sqrt{x^2+y^2}$ and $\theta=\arctan\frac yx$.
That is, unless $x\le 0$ in which case we have to select the appropriate $\theta$ in the unit circle, as it is out of range of $\arctan$.

In this case we have $x=12$ and $y=16$. Therefore $r=\sqrt{12^2+16^2}=20$ and $\theta=\arctan\frac{16}{12}\approx 53.1°$
 
Thank you so much Professor.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top