How Does a Magnetic Field Affect Eigenfrequencies in a Harmonic Oscillator?

  • Thread starter Thread starter qspeechc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenfrequencies
qspeechc
Messages
839
Reaction score
15

Homework Statement


Hello everyone. I'm trying to find the eiegenfrequencies in a problem.

We have a particle of mass m, charge e, that is subject to a linear restoring force
\textbf{F} = -k\textbf{r}
and the particle is in a magnetic field \textbf{B} = B\textbf{k}[/itex]<br /> (in the z-direction)<br /> <br /> <h2>The Attempt at a Solution</h2><br /> I am a bit confused ecause I only get one eigen-frequency: sqrt(k/m), which is as though the magnetic field is not there.<br /> <br /> In finding the freq.s you determine the kinetic and potential energy. Th magnetic field has no addittion to the potential energy? This is what I did. I took:<br /> U = 0.5k(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)<br /> T = 0.5mv^2<br /> where v = &lt;dx/dt, dy/dt, dz/dt&gt;<br /> which gave me the above answer, which I suspect is wrong, partly because the question goes on to say:<br /> &quot;Write your answer in terms of sqrt(k/m) and the cyclotron freq. Hint: use the variable u=x+iy&quot;<br /> <br /> I would be grateful for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Well, electromagnetic Lagrangian is a little different, because there is a velocity-dependent force. I think it is

L = T - q\phi + q \mathbf{v\cdot A}

where A is the vector potential of magnetic field.
 


Hhmm. I'll have to look it up. We never did the Lagrangian when considering velocity-dependent forces. I guess I'll have to look in another book. Thanks for the help Irid.
 


I'm sorry, this still isn't working. Do I assume each component x, y, z undergoes SHM, ie are of the form cos(wt), where w is the eigenfrequency, and then solve for w?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top