How Does a Spherical Inclusion Affect Potential in a Parallel Plate Capacitor?

alejandrito29
Messages
148
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Capacitor parallel plates separation $$d$$, potencial diference $$V_0$$, at the center there is a semi sphere of radius $r_0$.

Find the potencial as function of position if $$d>>r_0$$

Homework Equations


I think that relevant equation are Gauss Law

The Attempt at a Solution


Mi proposed of solution is

$$V_{plates}= \sigma /\epsilon_0 z $$

for $$r<|r_0|$$

Gauss Low

$$E 4/3 \pi r^2 = \sigma 4/3 \pi r_0^2$$

$$E= \sigma r_0^2 /\epsilon_0 r^{-2} \hat{r} $$

$$ V_{sp} = \sigma r_0 /\epsilon_0 ( r_0/r-1) = \sigma r_0 /\epsilon_0 ( r_0/\sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}-1) $$

And for $$r>|r_0|$$

$$ V=V_{plates}+V_{sp}$$

Help please
 

Attachments

  • 111111.jpg
    111111.jpg
    4.3 KB · Views: 425
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Alex,

Can't really follow. It looks to me as if you assume ##\sigma## is a constant, but why would it be constant ? The plates are conducting, so the electric field has to be perpendicular to the surface at all places. I don't think you potential satisfies that.

Note that your addition counts in a circular disk radius r0 that isn't really there !
 
Tanks

Some suggest for solving my problem?

my adittion out of radius $$r_0$$ is because there is two field electrics at zone $$r>|r_0|$$, then two potential . I don't am sure of this.

Help please
 

Attachments

  • 111111.jpg
    111111.jpg
    8.2 KB · Views: 432
I think I understand what you mean, and I tried to bring across that the complete field is not a simple addition obtained from two plates and half a sphere. You will have to find something that satisfies the field equations and the boundary conditions as well. Not so trivial, I grant you. Do you know about the image charge method ?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top