How Does a Varying Force Affect Kinetic Energy in Motion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between varying force and kinetic energy for a block on a frictionless surface. The force acting on the block is defined as F(x) = (2.5 - x^2) N, and the user calculates work done from x = 0 to x = 2.0 m, arriving at a value of 2 1/3 J. However, it is clarified that the kinetic energy at a specific point and the maximum kinetic energy during motion are not the same; the latter occurs at a different point where the force is parallel to displacement. The work-energy theorem is emphasized, indicating that the work done translates to a change in kinetic energy, requiring separate calculations for each part of the question. Thus, the answers to parts (a) and (b) will differ based on the definitions and conditions provided.
missrikku
Hello again! I just want to check if this is correct..

A 1.5 kg block is initially at rest on a horizontal frictionless surface when a horizontal force in the pos direction of an x-axis is applied to the block. The force is given by F(x) = (2.5 - x^2)i N, where x is in m and the initial position of the block is x = 0.

a) what is the kinetic energy of the block as it passes through x = 2.0 m?

b) what is the maximum kinetic energy of the block between x = 0 and x = 2.0 m


Wouldn't I get the same answer for both a and b?

I did the following:

** S = integral sign

W = S F(x)dx = Kf - Ki

with xi = 0 and xf = 2.0:

S F(x)dx = 2.5x -x^3/3 --> 2 1/3 J

Wouldn't the ans for both a and be be 2 1/3 J?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, since this is a horizontal surface, there is no change in potential energy so the change in kinetic energy must be the work done by the force. Integrating the force form the initial point to the last gives that work.

"Wouldn't the ans for both a and be be 2 1/3 J?"

Would it? Certainly the speed and energy will be increasing as long as the force is in the same direction but they will start decreasing when the force changes direction. Where does the force change direction?
 


Your approach is correct and you have correctly calculated the work done by the force F(x) on the block as it moves from x = 0 to x = 2.0 m. However, the work done by a force is not equal to the kinetic energy of the object. Kinetic energy is the energy possessed by an object due to its motion, and it is equal to 1/2 mv^2, where m is the mass of the object and v is its velocity.

To find the kinetic energy of the block at x = 2.0 m, you need to use the work-energy theorem, which states that the work done by a force is equal to the change in kinetic energy of the object. In this case, the work done by the force F(x) will result in a change in the kinetic energy of the block from its initial value (which is zero, since it is initially at rest) to its final value at x = 2.0 m.

So, to answer part (a), you need to calculate the work done by the force F(x) from x = 0 to x = 2.0 m, and then use this value to find the change in kinetic energy of the block. This will give you the kinetic energy of the block at x = 2.0 m.

To answer part (b), you need to calculate the maximum kinetic energy of the block between x = 0 and x = 2.0 m. This will be the maximum value of kinetic energy that the block reaches during its motion, and it will occur at a specific point between x = 0 and x = 2.0 m. To find this point, you can use the fact that the work done by a force is maximum when the force is parallel to the displacement of the object. So, you need to find the point at which the force F(x) is parallel to the displacement of the block, and then calculate the work done by this force at that point. This will give you the maximum kinetic energy of the block between x = 0 and x = 2.0 m.

Therefore, the answers to parts (a) and (b) will be different, as they are asking for two different things - the kinetic energy of the block at a specific point, and the maximum kinetic energy reached during its motion. I hope this helps clarify your understanding of work and kinetic energy. Keep up the good
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top