How does Ampere's Law apply to a long thick slab on the z axis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kvm90
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ampere's law Law
AI Thread Summary
Ampere's Law can be applied to a long thick slab by considering the current density J in the x direction. The confusion arises in calculating the line integral of the magnetic field B around the Amperean loop, specifically why it is represented as BL instead of B(2L). The key point is that only the sections of the loop outside the slab contribute to the integral, leading to the simplified expression. A diagram illustrating the slab and the Amperean loop would clarify the situation further. Understanding these concepts is crucial for mastering electromagnetism, especially during finals.
Kvm90
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hey all- I'm a Junior in college, pretty much have Ampere's law down except there's always been one thing I don't quite understand and have just memorized.

Say you have a long thick slab from -z to z on the z axis. J= J in the x direction. Find the B field in and out of the slab.

My attempt:

Use amperes law. I understand the RHS 100%, simple. On the LHS, however, I can't understand why int(B.dl) is BL rather that B(2L). Two sides of your Amperean loop are within the slab so why is int B.dl just BL.

Quick help would be appreciated; finals week- ugh!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If anyone can help tonight that would be great; is my question unclear?

I really want to fill this gap in my understanding of the basics of E&M
 
I'm struggling to understand exactly what you mean by "long thick slab from -z to z on the z axis", perhaps a diagram would be helpful. Drawing your amperian loop on the diagram and explicitly writing out both sides of the equation you are trying to understand would make it even easier to help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top