How does amplitude modulation work

AI Thread Summary
Amplitude modulation (AM) involves varying the amplitude of a carrier wave in accordance with a modulating signal, resulting in the creation of sidebands. The carrier wave maintains a constant amplitude while the sidebands, which carry the information, vary in amplitude. Observing the waveform on an oscilloscope shows the amplitude changes, while a spectrum analyzer displays a stable carrier frequency alongside varying sideband frequencies. The mathematical representation confirms that the carrier's amplitude remains unchanged, with the sidebands reflecting the modulating signal's influence. Thus, the initial claim about the carrier's amplitude not changing is accurate in the context of AM.
ASidd
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
I read on a website that in amplitude modulation the actual carrier wave does not change its amplitude but rather the sidebands.

Is this true
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Amplitude modulation means that the amplitude of the carrier wave varies with the frequency of the modulating signal. If it is y(t)=Bcos(ωt) the time dependence of the whole transmitted wave can be written as
Y(t)=(A+Bcos(ωt))cos(Ωt)=Acos(Ωt)+Bcos(ωt)cos(Ωt).
Using the identity cos(a+b)+cos(a-b)=2cos(a)cos(b), the second term can be written as B/2(cos((Ω+ω)t)+B/2(cos((Ω-ω)t).

The modulated wave consist of the carrier with the original amplitude and two side-bands with half the amplitude of the modulating signal.

ehild
 
ASidd said:
I read on a website that in amplitude modulation the actual carrier wave does not change its amplitude but rather the sidebands.

Is this true
Well, if you read it on a website, then it must be true. :wink:

If you watch the waveform on an oscilloscope, you see the amplitude varying, just as the title implies. But if you watch the display on a spectrum analyzer, you see a strong line at the carrier frequency and the height of this line does not vary; there are other lines either side of the carrier, and these are at the sideband frequencies. In the first reply in your thread, ehild has shown the mathematics behind this, for the case of a sinusoidal modulating signal, demonstrating that the amplitude of that carrier frequency component is a constant.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top