How Does an Electron Behave in a 1D Crystal Potential Well?

wavingerwin
Messages
93
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An electron in a one dimensional crystal is bound by:

U(x) = \frac{-\overline{h}^{2}x^{2}}{mL^{2}\left(L^{2}-x^{2}\right)}
for
\left|x\right| < L

and
x = infinity
for
\left|x\right| \geq L

Show that a stationary state for the electron in the potential well
\psi(x) = A\left(1-\frac{x^{2}}{L^{2}}\right)
satisfies the Schrodinger's Equation

and find E

Homework Equations



\frac{-\overline{h}^{2}}{2m}\frac{d^{2}\psi}{dx^{2}}+U(x)\psi = E\psi

The Attempt at a Solution



from Schrodinger's:

\frac{d^{2}\psi}{dx^{2}} = \frac{-2m}{\overline{h}^{2}}\left(\frac{\overline{h}^{2}x^{2}}{mL^{2}\left(L^{2}-x^{2}\right)}+E\right)\psi

and from the guess solution:

\frac{d^{2}\psi}{dx^{2}} = \frac{-2A}{L^{2}} = \frac{-2}{\left(L^{2}-x^{2}\right)}\psi

and so equating \frac{d^{2}\psi}{dx^{2}},
I deduced that it satisfies the Schrodinger's equation but only when E = 0 and x = L.

Am I right?

I am also concerned because the potential, U, is negative 'inside' the well...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It can't be a stationary state if it only satisfies the Schrodinger eqn at a single 'x' point. I think you need to double check your work on this problem, since you made an incorrect assumption.

I suggest simplifying the two terms you list in the parenthesis of the first eqn in your attempt at a solution. Convert it to one giant fraction. Then try to find an energy that will remove the 'x'-dependence in the numerator of that fraction. You will want to keep the x-dependence in the denominator since it needs to equal your 2nd equation. You want this equality to be applied to any value of 'x' and not just one specific value like before.
 
Hi nickjer

After putting it as a single fraction, I got:

<br /> \frac{d^{2}\psi}{dx^{2}} = \left(\frac{-2}{\left(L^{2}-x^{2}\right)}\frac{x^{2}\left(\overline{h}^{2}-mE\right)+mL^{4}E}{L^{2}\overline{h}^{2}}\right)\psi<br />

I just cannot figure out how to remove the x dependencies in the numerator.

If I equate this with
<br /> \frac{d^{2}\psi}{dx^{2}} = \frac{-2}{\left(L^{2}-x^{2}\right)}\psi<br />

I can get a value for E, however it depends on x, which i think is wrong...

Maybe, just maybe, is the question wrong and
<br /> \psi(x) = A\left(1-\frac{x^{2}}{L^{2}}\right)<br />
is not a possible solution to the situation?
 
Double check your math for the numerator. I believe you are missing something. Also, once you correct the numerator, then you see the x^2 has a coefficient next to it in parenthesis. Very similar to what you have now (although yours is slightly wrong). Since you are solving for the energy that makes this stationary state satisfy Schrodinger's eqn, then you are free to choose an E that will make this coefficient in parenthesis go to 0. Then you will have 0*x^2 = 0. So you canceled out the x-dependence.
 
If I'm right this time, I was missing L2

And so I equate 0 = hbar2 - L2mE

and also, after eliminating x2, I equate to the guess solution,

and both of them give me a consistent answer:

E = \frac{\overline{h}^{2}}{mL^{2}}

Now, I think this is right!

If it is, thanks very much :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top