I How Does Angular Diameter Distance Apply to the Last Scattering Surface?

AI Thread Summary
Angular diameter distance is defined as the ratio of an object's physical size to its angular size. The discussion focuses on calculating the angular diameter distance to the last scattering surface, emphasizing that this distance is influenced by the universe's expansion and the scale factor at the time of emission. The proper motion distance, derived from the comoving radial coordinate, is essential for determining the angular diameter distance, which accounts for the universe's expansion between emission and observation. The confusion arises from understanding how physical distance relates to angular diameter distance, particularly considering the scale factor's effect. Clarification is provided by comparing the concept to the distance between two stars at the time they emitted light, highlighting the importance of the universe's expansion in this context.
WeiShan Ng
Messages
36
Reaction score
2
The definition of the angular diameter distance is the ratio of an object's physical transverse size to its angular size. However when I was reading my textbook, *Astrophysics in a Nutshell by Dan Maoz pp.220-221*, I am having some trouble trying to understand the notion of **angular diameter distance to the last scattering surface**. The text calculates the angular diameter distance to the last scattering surface ##D_A##:

> Consider flat cosmology (k=0) with no cosmological constant. We wish to calculate the angular size on the sky, as it appears today of a region of physical size
$$D_s=\frac{2ct_{rec}}{\sqrt{3}}=140 kpc$$ from which light was emitted at time ##t_{rec}##. Between recombination and the present time, the Universal expansion is matter-dominated, with ## R \propto t^{2/3} ## for this model
$$\frac{R}{R_0}=\left( \frac{t}{t_0} \right)^{2/3} = \frac{1}{1+z}$$
and hence we can write
$$D_s=\frac{2ct_0}{\sqrt{3}}(1+z_{rec})^{-3/2}$$
The angle subtended by the region equals its size, divided by its distance to us at the
**time of emission** (since that is when the angle between rays emanating from two
sides of the region was set).

I'm not sure what does the last line actually mean..Can someone please elaborate more on this? I just simply take the #D_s# as the "physical transverse size".

> As we are concerned with observed angles, the type
of distance we are interested in is the distance which, when squared and multiplied
by 4π, will give the area of the sphere centered on us and passing through the
said region. If the comoving radial coordinate of the surface of last scattering is r, the required distance is **currently** just ##r\times R_0## and is called the proper motion distance. The proper motion distance can be solved using null geodesic in the FRW metric
$$\int_{t_{rec}}^{t_0} \frac{c dt}{R(t)} = \int_{0}^{r}\frac{dr}{\sqrt{1-kr^2}}$$
Setting k = 0, and substituting
$$R(t)=R_0 \left( \frac{t}{t_0} \right)^{2/3}$$ and integrate
$$rR_0=3ct_0[1-(1+z_{rec})^{-1/2}]$$

So I take this as the physical distance of the region from us. The next part is what confuse me:
> However, at the time of emission, the scale factor of the Universe was 1 + z times smaller. The so-called **angular diameter distance** to the last scattering surface is therefore
$$D_A=\frac{rR_0}{1+z}=3ct_0[(1+z_{rec})^{-1}-(1+z_{rec})^{-3/2}]$$

How does a physical distance ##rR_0## comes into play in the angular diameter distance, because from its definition it is just $$D_A=\frac{\text{physical transverse size}}{\text{angular size}}$$??
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
WeiShan Ng said:
I'm not sure what does the last line actually mean..Can someone please elaborate more on this? I just simply take the #D_s# as the "physical transverse size".

Yes. It is easier if you say 2 stars instead of "region". That was the distance between the two stars when they each radiated a photon. The stars may have moved while the photons were on their way here.

The textbook wording is more correct and it applies to any source.
 
I found the derivation in "Gravitation and Cosmology" by Weinberg at pp.421-424
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top