How Does Angular Momentum Vary with Orbital Distance in Physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SignaturePF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation
AI Thread Summary
Angular momentum in circular orbits is expressed as L = m√(GMR), indicating that it varies with orbital distance. The discussion highlights the relationship between circular and elliptical orbits, noting that the velocity at perihelion is greater than at aphelion, which affects angular momentum. Choices B, C, and E are eliminated based on the analysis of velocities and distances, leading to the conclusion that LA > LB > LC. The need for a more rigorous approach is emphasized, particularly concerning the semi-major axis of elliptical orbits. Overall, the conservation of angular momentum principles are central to understanding the variations in angular momentum with orbital distance.
SignaturePF
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



https://aapt.org/physicsteam/2010/upload/2009_F-ma.pdf

Homework Equations


L = mrv
L = Iω


The Attempt at a Solution


For a circular orbit:
Fc = Fg
mv^2/r = Gmm/r^2
v = √(GM/R)
Thus:
l = mR√(GM/R)
l = m√(GMR)

This means that LA > LC, eliminating choices B, C, and E.

Now, to compare B, C
I'm interested in finding a more rigorous approach, but here goes.
The point of intersection between the Circlular path that C orbits on and the elliptical path that B orbits.
We know that the velocity at the perihelion is greater than the aphelion, that is, the velocity of the intersection is the maximum velocity that B ever achieves. I then made an intelligent guess and postulated that thus B > C,
leading to LA > LB > LC

Could you suggest more rigor/principles to do this question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If choices B,C & E are eliminated - what is left are:

(A) LA > LB > LC
(E) The relationship between the magnitudes is different at various instants in time.

Look at E.
Consider: conservation of angular momentum.
 
SignaturePF said:
l = m√(GMR)
...
Could you suggest more rigor/principles to do this question?
You've already done that: for B, r is never less than C's and never more than A's.
 
Ya I see that but isn't it root(GM/a), where a is the semi major axis for object B. Doesn't that mean that the radius in the numerator won't cancel with the semi major axis on the denominator?
That's where I was worried.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top