How Does Angular Speed Change When Skaters Connect by a Pole?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the scenario of two skaters, each with a mass of 85 kg, connecting via a pole while moving towards each other at 1.6 m/s on frictionless ice. To analyze their motion post-connection, the conservation of angular momentum is applied, with the moment of inertia calculated based on their distances from the axis of rotation. The initial angular momentum is set equal to the final angular momentum, leading to the equation involving their combined moment of inertia and angular speed. A participant expresses confusion over the calculations, particularly regarding the moment of inertia and the resulting angular speed, which they initially calculated as 0.229 rad/s but suspect is incorrect. The conversation emphasizes the need to correctly apply the principles of angular momentum and moment of inertia to derive the accurate angular speed after the skaters connect.
Punchlinegirl
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
Two skaters, each of mass 85 kg, approach each other along parallel paths separated by 3.5 m. They have equal and opposite velocities of 1.6 m/s. The first skater carries one end of a long pole with negligible mass, and the second skater grabs the other end of it as she passes. Assume frictionless ice. Describe quantitatively the motion of the skaters after they have become connected by the pole. What is their angular speed?

I know that to solve this I need to use conservation of angular momentum, but I'm unsure what the moment of inertia is. Would it just be .5MR^2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just add the moments of inertia of the two skaters with respect to the axis of rotation (center of pole). The moment of inertia of one person (treated as a point particle) is mr^2.
 
Ok, I used:
L init= L final
Iw= Iw
mr^2 = (mr^2 + mr^2) w
I converted the linear velocity to angular velocity, v=wr
subsituting gives
85(3.5^2)(.457)= 2(85)(3.5^2) w
and dividing gives w= .229 rad/s, which isn't right.
Can someone tell me what I did wrong?
 
Since the parameters for both skaters are the exactly the same both sides of the angular momentum equation will be exactly the same as well if you write them in terms of the same quantities.

I.e. Iw = Iw (2mr^2)w = (2mr^2)w

try using the fact that L = (m+m)vr = 2mvr along with Iw
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...

Similar threads

Back
Top