How Does Attaching a Weight Affect Spring Equilibrium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicshawk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring Tension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the equilibrium position of a lump of putty attached to a spring, initially unstressed and under tension. The natural length of the spring is 2 meters, and when the putty, weighing 4 Newtons, is attached, the spring's behavior changes due to the forces acting on it. The modulus of elasticity is calculated using Hooke's Law, yielding a value of 80 Newtons. The equilibrium height of the putty above the floor is determined to be 0.976 meters, factoring in the unequal extension of the spring above and below the putty. The analysis highlights the need to treat the spring sections as separate entities to accurately assess the forces and resulting equilibrium.
physicshawk
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
A point A of the ceiling is directly above a point B of the floor 2.5 meters below. A and B are joined by a light spring of natural length 2 meters; the tension in the spring is then 20 Newtons. A Lump of Putty of weight 4 Newtons is now attached to the spring at the point 1 meter above the floor. At what height above the floor will the Putty rest in equilibrium?

My working and diagram;
http://www.flickr.com/photos/90383971@N05/10050116394/in/photostream/
My Ans:
First i found natural length of the spring.
Without the Putty:
through Hooke's Law, we know
T= λx ⁄ l
where T = tension, l= natural length, λ = modulus of elasticity, x = extension
λ = Tl ⁄ x
λ = 20 * 2 / 0.5
λ = 80 Newtons

So this is the modulus of elasticity of the spring. From here the problem becomes complicated for me. Because after the Putty is attached, the spring is streched from the top and i do not know how to bring into my calculation how the spring below the Putty affects the extension. I'm lost, Could you PLEASE help.
The answer in my book is given 0.976 meters (which is the height of the putty above the floor)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that in this case, the upper part of the string extend slightly, whereas the lower part of the spring will be compressed somewhat (relative to the upper part), so that you do NOT have an equally distributed elongation of the spring. Note that the upper part of the string pulles upwards, the lower part downwards. Calling the length by which the stretched lengths of the springs changes, you get the equation
k(2.5+l*-2)-k(2.5-l*-2)-mg=0 for the equilibrium position of the putty.

Note that the equilibrium tension in the spring for the case of no putty vanishes identically as a parameter (as it should)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Why the factor of 2 in your calculation of λ ?
 
gneill said:
Why the factor of 2 in your calculation of λ ?
The 2 is the initial length 2 meters.
 
If the putty is attached to the stretched spring 1 meter above the floor, what fraction of the original spring length (2m) is below the putty (before the putty is attached)? What fraction of the original spring length is above the putty. What is the unstretched length of the portion of the spring above the putty? What is the unstretched length of the portion of the spring below the putty? The portion of the spring above the putty and the portion below the putty can be looked upon as two separate springs, with these unstretched lengths. What are the spring constants k = λ/l for each of these two springs? If the putty moves down by Δx, what is the force that the upper spring exerts on the putty, and in what direction. What is the force that the lower spring exerts on the putty, and in what direction. What is the total spring force on the putty, and in what direction?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top