How Does Changing the Power in the Wave Equation Affect Its Behavior?

MarkB
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
What happens when you make the x varible in the wave egn to some power

m(dx/dt) + k x^n =0

What happens when n increases/decreases?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Um, perhaps you might want to get the correct form of the wave equation first?
 
MarkB said:
What happens when you make the x varible in the wave egn to some power

m(dx/dt) + k x^n =0

What happens when n increases/decreases?

That diff. Eq. is seperable, and has the solution

x(t)=\left( C_1+(n-1)\frac{k}{m}t\right) ^{-\frac{1}{n-1}}

which is vastly different from

m(dx/dt) + k x =0

which is also seperable, and has the solution

x(t)=C_2e^{-\frac{k}{m}t}

but it is notable that the limit as n->1 of the former solution is the later solution if C_1=C_2=1.
 
Last edited:
benorin said:
That diff. Eq. is seperable, and has the solution

x(t)=\left( C+(n-1)\frac{k}{m}t\right) ^{-\frac{1}{n-1}}

I guess you meant C times (1+ (n-1)...)

It's interesting. It's neat to see the exponential recovered as n ->1.
 
MarkB said:
What happens when you make the x varible in the wave egn to some power

m(dx/dt) + k x^n =0

What happens when n increases/decreases?

If that were a second derivative, then you would be closer to a wave equation.
 
Yeah sorry I forgot to make the eqn: m(d^(2)x/dt^(2)) + k X^(n)=0

this is the eqn of the wave cause by a simple harmonic Isolator.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top