How Does Changing Variables Simplify Nonlinear PDEs?

aquarian11
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I need guidance regarding PDE.
If u have a nonlinear PDE as
Ut+Us+a*U*Us*b*Usss=0
where U is function of (s,t) and a,b are constants.
by introducing new variable x=s-t we will get
Ut+a*U*Ux+b*Uxxx=0
Ut means partial derivative w.r.t time
Us means partial derivative w.r.t s.

How can we get the second equation from the first one?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
By using the chain rule.

U_s= U_t \frac{\partial t}{\partial s}+ U_x\frac{\partial x}{\partial s}
Note: if you are going to use x= s- t to replace s only, you will need to think of s as a function of the other variable, t.
If x= s- t, then s= s+ t so both partial derivatives are 1:
U_s= U_t+ U_x[/itex]<br /> U_ss= (U_t+ U_x)_s= (U_t+ U_x)_t + (U_t+ U_x)_x= U_tt+ 2U_tx+ U&lt;br /&gt; _xx<br /> <br /> Similarly, <br /> U_sss= U_ttt+ 3Uttx+ 3Utxx+ Uxxx<br /> Sustitute those into you equation.
 
Subsituting these , will not give me the desired equation.
 
I have solve it, same concept of chain rule but with different approach.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top