How Does Converting a Cylinder to a Sphere Affect Pressure Gradient?

AI Thread Summary
Converting a cylinder made of semipermeable material to a sphere affects the pressure gradient due to the differing geometries. In a cylinder, the pressure profile decreases in proportion to the radius, while in a sphere, it decreases in proportion to the square of the radius. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding fluid flow dynamics and the pressure difference across the shell in both cases. Participants suggest conducting preliminary research on osmotic pressure and fluid dynamics to better grasp the underlying principles. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for foundational knowledge before delving into specific calculations regarding pressure gradients.
edwardone123
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Have cylinder made from semipermeable material .There is positive pressure inside cylinder and negative pressure outside cylinder .How gradient of pressure will be changed if we convert from cylinder t o sphere?
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess this is a fluid dynamics problem, @Chestermiller could have a look at this but I think you should give us a diagram or an image. I believe the crucial piece of information we are missing is how is the fluid flow outside and/or inside the cylinder or the sphere.
 
edwardone123 said:
Have cylinder made from semipermeable material .There is positive pressure inside cylinder and negative pressure outside cylinder .How gradient of pressure will be changed if we convert from cylinder t o sphere?
Thank you
I take it that this shell, whether cylinder or sphere, is of non-negligible thickness and that this thickness is the same for the two situations. I also take it that the pressure difference across the shell is also identical in the two cases.

One would further assume that the diffusion rate through an infinitesimal thickness of shell is in proportion to the pressure gradient across that thickness.

In the case of a cylinder, one can see that to maintain a constant flow rate through all of the concentric shells, the pressure profile across the shell must decrease in proportion to the radius. In the case of a sphere, it must decrease in proportion to the square of the radius.

Have you computed the pressure gradient as a function of radius for the cylindrical situation yet?
 
edwardone123 said:
Have cylinder made from semipermeable material .There is positive pressure inside cylinder and negative pressure outside cylinder .How gradient of pressure will be changed if we convert from cylinder t o sphere?
Thank you
What research have you done so far regarding the fundamentals of (presumably aqueous electrolyte) solution flow and pressure drop through semipermeable membranes?
 
Average trans membrane pressure in this situation is about 100-150 mm Hg .I am just testing hypothesis and didn't do any preliminary research.What info could be utilized?
Thank you very much
 
edwardone123 said:
Average trans membrane pressure in this situation is about 100-150 mm Hg .I am just testing hypothesis and didn't do any preliminary research.What info could be utilized?
Thank you very much
Not so fast. We're not going to spoon feed this to you. What is the basic equation for the osmotic pressure difference when there is no flow? You are going to have to do some research on your own first before we are willing to help you.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top