How Does cos(θ)sin(θ+φ)-sinθcos(θ+φ) Simplify to sinφ?

leaf
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Can someone please show me, step-by-step, how

cos(θ)sin(θ+φ)-sinθcos(θ+φ)

simplifies to sinφ?

I know I have to use trig identities, and I got to cos2θsinφ-sin2θcosφ but I'm not sure where to go from there.

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
have you tried the ##sin^2\theta + cos^2\theta = 1## ?
 
Yeah, if I substitute for both I get:

sin(\phi)-sin^2(\theta)sin(\phi)-cos(\phi)+cos^2(\theta)cos(\phi)

But I should probably only substitute for sin or cos so that gives me:

sin(\phi)-sin^2(\theta)sin(\phi)-sin^2(\theta)cos(\phi)

or

cos^2(\theta)sin(\phi)-cos(\phi)+cos^2(\theta)cos(\phi)

but I'm still not sure where to go from here.
 
sin(u+v) = sin(u)cos(v)+sin(v)cos(u). Also sin(-u) = -sin(u).
 
  • Like
Likes leaf and jedishrfu
leaf said:
Can someone please show me, step-by-step, how

cos(θ)sin(θ+φ)-sinθcos(θ+φ)

simplifies to sinφ?

I know I have to use trig identities, and I got to cos2θsinφ-sin2θcosφ but I'm not sure where to go from there.

Thanks
Maybe someone else already told you but you can use the next identity

sin(u+-v) = sin(u)cos(v)+-cos(u)sin(v)

if oyu compare it with you homework then the answers is:

sin(θ+φ-θ)=sinφ
 
  • Like
Likes leaf
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top