How Does Current Behave Over Time in AC Circuits?

AI Thread Summary
In AC circuits, the relationship between current and voltage can be complex, particularly in purely resistive loads where current and voltage are in phase. While voltage fluctuates, current also varies accordingly, contradicting the notion that current remains constant. When measuring fluctuating voltage, it is essential to measure the corresponding fluctuating current. For average measurements, using root mean square (RMS) values for both voltage and current is necessary, but multiplying these RMS values does not always yield accurate power calculations due to the influence of the power factor. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for effective power engineering.
Benjamin_harsh
Messages
211
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
Current Vs Time in AC Current.
Relevant Equations
Current Vs Time in AC Current.
I always find voltage vs time majorly in case of AC current. What about current V time in AC current cases?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One can plot current versus time, certainly.

For a purely resistive load (an AC power source driving current through a resistor), how does current relate to voltage?
 
jbriggs444 said:
One can plot current versus time, certainly.

For a purely resistive load (an AC power source driving current through a resistor), how does current relate to voltage?
So how current stays same while voltage repeatedly fluctuates in AC current?
 
Benjamin_harsh said:
So how current stays same while voltage repeatedly fluctuates in AC current?
Current does not stay the same in this situation.

If you are measuring a fluctuating voltage, you should be working to measure a fluctuating current.

If you are measuring an average (for instance, a root mean square average) voltage then you should be working to measure an average (for instance, a root mean square average) current.

Note that multiplying RMS voltage by RMS current is not guaranteed to yield RMS power. Hence the notion of a power factor. [That was a serious learning moment when I first encountered that -- those power engineering dudes face interesting challenges. Some of them hang out here]
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top