How Does Doubling Charge Affect Electric Field Strength in a Capacitor?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phyBnewb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual
phyBnewb
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A parallel-plate capacitor consists of two square plates, size L x L, separated by distance d. The plates are given charge +-Q . Each part changes only one quantity; the other quantities have their initial values.

Part A

What is the ratio E(final)/E(initial) of the final to initial electric field strengths if Q is doubled?





Homework Equations



I know that:E = kQ/r^2 ,where k= 8.99*10^9


The Attempt at a Solution



I am not sure where to start here for this question.
Since it is a ratio of E final / E initial would Q cause E to be something like this?
E = k(2Q)/r^2 => 1/2E for E final?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I tried 1/2 but it was incorrect. Help please!
 
You are using the formula for a point charge in the case of a parallel plate capacitor.
The electric field inside the capacitor is constant and is given by E=V/d where V is teh voltage and d is the distance between the plates.
 
i figured it out. it wasnt 1/2, for Efinal/Einitial = 2
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top