How Does Electron Spin Orientation Relate to Its Velocity and Antineutrino Path?

Tegalad
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


After beta- decay electron and antineutrino comes out, electron is moving along z axis and it is moving with velocity v. It's spinor is
## \mid\chi\rangle=A\left(\frac{\sqrt{1+\frac{v}{c}}\sin\frac{\theta}{2}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v}{c}}\cos\frac{\theta}{2}}\right) ## where A is normalization constant,## \theta ## an angle between z axis and ## \overline{\nu}## movement path (antineutrino's spin is in the same direction as it's movement path)
##\theta=\frac{\pi}{2}## and ##\frac{v}{c}=0,15##
1) Calculate the probability that measured electron's spin will be directed along z axis
2) Calculate the probability that measured electron's spin will be directed along z axis, if the angle of ## \overline{\nu}## trajectory can't be measured and electron's spin is registered by averaging all ## \theta ## angles

Homework Equations


By inserting all values and normalizing the function, spinor is ## \mid\chi\rangle=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\left(\begin{array}{c}\sqrt{0,85}\\ \sqrt{1,15}\end{array}\right)##
##\mid\uparrow_z\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\begin{array}{c}1\\ 0\end{array}\right)##
##S_z= \frac{\hbar}{2}\begin{bmatrix}1 & 0 \\0 & -1 \end{bmatrix}##

The Attempt at a Solution


1) ##\langle\uparrow_z\mid\chi\rangle=c## then c squared is probability that the spin will be along z axis. Is it good ?
2) ##\overline{S_z}=\langle\chi\mid\ S_z\mid\chi\rangle ⇒ \overline{S_z}=\frac{\hbar}{2}## then ##P_+\frac{\hbar}{2}+(1-P_+)(-\frac{\hbar}{2})=\frac{\hbar}{2}\cos\theta## After that I calculate ##P_+##. Is this good or I am missing something? Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tegalad said:
## \mid\chi\rangle=A\left(\frac{\sqrt{1+\frac{v}{c}}\sin\frac{\theta}{2}}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v}{c}}\cos\frac{\theta}{2}}\right) ##
Tegalad said:
## \mid\chi\rangle=\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\left(\begin{array}{c}\sqrt{0,85}\\ \sqrt{1,15}\end{array}\right)##
I guess that in the first equation, it is not fraction but two elements of a vector. In that case, are you sure that the second equation is correct?

Tegalad said:
##\mid\uparrow_z\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(\begin{array}{c}1\\ 0\end{array}\right)##
Is that a normalised state?

Tegalad said:
1) ##\langle\uparrow_z\mid\chi\rangle=c## then c squared is probability that the spin will be along z axis. Is it good ?
It should be ##|c|^2## (you have to account for the fact that ##c \in \mathbb{C}##).

Tegalad said:
2) ##\overline{S_z}=\langle\chi\mid\ S_z\mid\chi\rangle ⇒ \overline{S_z}=\frac{\hbar}{2}## then ##P_+\frac{\hbar}{2}+(1-P_+)(-\frac{\hbar}{2})=\frac{\hbar}{2}\cos\theta## After that I calculate ##P_+##. Is this good or I am missing something?
You are asked twice to calculate the probability that the measured electron's spin will be directed along the z axis. Why is your approach different in both cases?
 
DrClaude said:
I guess that in the first equation, it is not fraction but two elements of a vector. In that case, are you sure that the second equation is correct?
It shouldn't be a fraction and yes the second one is correct.

Is that a normalised state?
Yes, it is.

It should be ##|c|^2## (you have to account for the fact that ##c \in \mathbb{C}##).You are asked twice to calculate the probability that the measured electron's spin will be directed along the z axis. Why is your approach different in both cases?
Maybe I haven't made it clear enough, but in the first case angle theta is known and in the second one the spin is calculated by averaging all possible theta's
Thank you for your reply :)
 
Tegalad said:
Maybe I haven't made it clear enough, but in the first case angle theta is known and in the second one the spin is calculated by averaging all possible theta's
I had understood that. So, can you answer my questions?
 
DrClaude said:
I had understood that. So, can you answer my questions?
Now I see that I made a mistake, because I used a spinor with a given theta, so I would get the same result.
 
Tegalad said:
Now I see that I made a mistake, because I used a spinor with a given theta, so I would get the same result.
I don't understand what you mean, so I can't tell if your result will be correct.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top