How Does Electron Transition Calculate Atomic Energy Levels and Ionization?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating atomic energy levels and ionization using the formula E of nlow to nhigh = -2.178*10^-18 * Z^2/nhigh^2 - nlow^2. The energy required to remove an electron from a hydrogen atom is confirmed as 2.178*10^-18 J, and for one mole of electrons, it totals approximately 1.312*10^6 J/mol. However, there is a noted error in the calculation of Z for an ion with a transition wavelength of 13.4 nm, specifically in the expression used, which should include the term (1/nhigh^2 - 1/nlow^2) instead of nhigh^2 - nlow^2. The correct approach is recommended to clarify the calculations and achieve an accurate integer value for Z. The discussion emphasizes the importance of proper notation to avoid confusion in these calculations.
StephenDoty
Messages
261
Reaction score
0
E of nlow to nhigh= -2.178*10^-18 * Z^2/nhigh^2 - nlow^2

find the energy needed to remove an electron completely from a hydrogen atom and the energy needed to remove one mol of electrons from one mol of hydrogen atoms

Z= 1 nhigh= infinity nlow=1

E = 2.178*10^-18 J
one mole of electrons = 2.178*10^-18 * 6.022*10^23 = 1.312*10^6 J/mol
Are these right??

And use the above formula to find the value of Z for an ion whose 2 to 1 transition is associated with a wavelength of 13.4nm.

lamba of 2 to 1= hc/(2.178*10^-18 * Z^2/nhigh^2 - nlow^2)
z=sqrt(hc(nhigh^2-nlow^2)/(13.4*10^-9)(2.178*10^-18))
Z= 4.5
or 5
Is this right??

Thank you guys so much for your help.
Stephen
 
Physics news on Phys.org
StephenDoty said:
E of nlow to nhigh= -2.178*10^-18 * Z^2/nhigh^2 - nlow^2

Try to use TEX or at least brackets, it doesn't look OK at the moment.
 
Hello Stephen,

Looks good on the single hydrogen atom and mole-of-hydrogen question.

But it looks like there's an error somewhere in the Z question. The correct answer is very close to an integer.

I think the problem is with the expressions you are writing. There should be a term

( 1/nhigh^2 - 1/nlow^2 )​

but instead you have

nhigh^2 - nlow^2​

?

Regards,

Mark

p.s. Borek is correct, it's better to at least use brackets (parantheses) to express things properly and avoid confusion.
 
Z^2/nhigh^2 - nlow^2
is the same thing as z^2*(1/nhigh^2 - 1/nlow^2)
 
Okay, but in your expression

z = sqrt(...)​

it has mysteriously become, literally,

(nhigh^2-nlow^2)​

and that is wrong.

Try keeping it as

(1/nhigh^2 - 1/nlow^2)​

Also, you might find it easier to figure out what the energy is for 13.4 nm, and then work with the energy equation (1st equation of your 1st post).
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top