How Does Energy Transfer Occur Between Ice and Steam?

AI Thread Summary
Energy transfer occurs between ice and steam primarily from the steam to the ice, as heat flows from hotter to colder substances. While ice can have varying temperatures and some molecules may possess higher energy than certain steam molecules, the overall direction of energy transfer remains from steam to ice. The teacher's reference to energy being transferred from the ice may have been misleading, as it typically requires work to reverse the natural flow of energy. The average kinetic energy of the molecules in steam is higher than that in ice, leading to a net increase in the energy of the ice. Understanding this concept clarifies the dynamics of thermal energy exchange in mixtures of ice and steam.
danago
Gold Member
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
4
Hey. I wasnt sure where to post this, since it isn't an actual question i need to complete for school, but it relates to it.

When my year 11 physics class was solving the final temperature of an ice/steam mixture, my teacher kept talking about how energy is transferred too AND from the ice. Now, originally, i thought energy was transferred from a hotter substance to a colder substance, until their temperatures were equal. So in the ice/steam case, i would have thought that energy was only transferred from the steam to the ice.

I tried getting him to explain the transfer of energy from the ice, but he just couldn't give me a straigh forward answer. He even referred to it as 'cold energy' at one stage.

If anyone could bring shed some light on this topic, id greatly appreciate it.

Thanks alot,
Dan.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what point your teacher was trying to express. Under normal conditions, energy spontaneosly flows from the hotter object to the colder object. (To reverse this natural direction of flow--like in a refrigerator--requires work to be done.)

Can heat flow from ice? Sure, if it flows to something even colder. (Ice itelf can be any temperature from 0 degrees C on down. Ice at 0 degrees is hot compared to ice at -20 degrees.)
 
Thats exacly what i thought. I guess ill have to ask him again about this one.

Thanks for the reply,
Dan.
 
danago said:
Hey. I wasnt sure where to post this, since it isn't an actual question i need to complete for school, but it relates to it.

When my year 11 physics class was solving the final temperature of an ice/steam mixture, my teacher kept talking about how energy is transferred too AND from the ice. Now, originally, i thought energy was transferred from a hotter substance to a colder substance, until their temperatures were equal. So in the ice/steam case, i would have thought that energy was only transferred from the steam to the ice.

I tried getting him to explain the transfer of energy from the ice, but he just couldn't give me a straigh forward answer. He even referred to it as 'cold energy' at one stage.
Unless the ice is at absolute 0, the water molecules in the ice have kinetic energy (mostly vibrational). Since temperature is a measure of the average kinetic energy of the water molecules, we know that they do not all have the same energy. Some are vibrating faster and some more slowly than average. Some may even be moving around and some may have sufficient energy to leave the ice surface. Similarly, in steam the molecules have a range of kinetic energies. At any given moment, there may be some ice molecules that have more energy than some of the steam molecules.

So when the hot steam (water molecules with higher kinetic energy) contacts the ice, what happens? The average energy of the ice molecules increases and the average energy of the steam molecules decreases. Some original energy from the ice molecules may actually increase the energy of some steam molecules, but overall, the heat energy flows from the steam to the ice.

AM
 
oh ok. I see now. Thanks for clearing that up.

So the energy tranferred from the steam to the ice is much greater still than the amount from the ice to the steam though?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top