I was wondering what it means to have the density changing with time, does this reference the material derivitve (which seems to be at least partially with respect to time), or the straight partial derivitive of density WRT time?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Drho/Dt ~= 0 or partialrho/partialt ~=0?

The material derivative being D/Dt = partial/partialt + (Velocitydotgradient)

or with density: Drho/Dt = partialrho/partialt + (Velocitydotgradient)rho.

Given that the flow field may be examined with the conservation of mass, using the continuity equation:

parital rho/partial t + partial (u*rho)/partial x + partial (v*rho)/partial y + partial (w*rho)/partial z = 0

A possilble connection is that when the density is the same throughout the flow field, and unchanging with time (incompressible). Thus,

partial (u)/partial x + partial (v)/partial y + partial (w)/partial z will be equal to zero when rho(x,y,z,t) NEVER changes. Also, it is easy to obtain these partial derivitives when given a flowfield, like x=y^2-1, v=0, w=0.

However how can I determine if rho(x,y,z,t) changes with x,y,z but not with respect to t?

Expressions given for the conservation of mass including the material derivative are as follows:

Drho/Dt + rho*gradientdotvelocity= 0

or

Drho/Dt + rho*(divergence of Velocity)= 0

Again, it seems that Drho/Dt will have to be zero when the divergence ofVelocityis zero, which seems to be the same condition to show that density is not changing in an incompressible fluid.

However, does Drho/Dt =0 prove that density does not change WRT time, or that the sum of the local derivative (partialrho/partialt) just somehow cancels out the terms of the convective derivative (Velocitydotgradientrho)?

More importantly, may I claim that when divVelocity=gradientdotVelocity= 0 it follows thatVelocitydotgradient= 0 as well (commutative property of the dot product). and thus the only term remaining when the velocity gradient is zero from

Drho/Dt + rho*gradientdotvelocity= 0

is partialrho/partialt = 0, which would give me that rho(x,y,z,t) is not changing with time?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# How does flow field density change with time?

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - does flow field | Date |
---|---|

What does this mean? (equation for viscous flows) | Mar 13, 2016 |

Does a pump have a maximum flow rate for a given system? | Aug 12, 2015 |

Does steam flow from top to bottom or bottom to top | Dec 2, 2014 |

How does an air flow bench work | Apr 14, 2014 |

Why does gravity cause secondary flow in pipes? | Feb 14, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**