How Does Friction Affect Acceleration in High-Performance Race Cars?

AI Thread Summary
Friction plays a crucial role in the acceleration of high-performance race cars, with static friction enabling the tires to grip the track. The discussion highlights a specific scenario involving a 690-kg race car, where the maximum acceleration is influenced by a downforce of 4060 N and air resistance of 1190 N. Participants clarify that while air resistance acts in the negative direction, the frictional force generated by the tires actually acts in the positive direction to facilitate acceleration. A misunderstanding about the direction of friction was addressed, emphasizing that static friction opposes the backward push of the tires against the road. This correction is essential for accurately calculating the car's acceleration without slipping.
jehan4141
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
Air rushing over the wings of high-performance race cars generates unwanted horizontal air resistance but also causes a vertical downforce, which helps the cars hug the track more securely. The coefficient of static friction between the track and the tires of a 690-kg race car is 0.87. What is the magnitude of the maximum acceleration at which the car can speed up without its tires slipping when a 4060-N downforce and an 1190 N horizontal air resistance force act on it.

My work:

I get the general concept of the problem, but my confusion is about 1/2 way into the problem.

The free-body diagram would be like so:
The car is moving in the positive direction, +x.
Frictional force and air resistant point in the negative direction, -x.
Normal force points up.
Weight and downward force point down.GIVEN
coefficient of friction, u = 0.87
m = 690 kg
w = 690(9.8) = 6762 N
Downforce, Fd = 4060 N
Air resistance, Fa = 1190 N

Normal Force = Fn = 6762 + 4060
Normal Force = Fn = 10, 822 N

Force of friction = Ff = (Fn)(u)
Ff = (10822)(0.87)
Ff = 9415.14 N

We know that frictional force is in the -x direction.

Net Fx = -Fa + (-Ff) = ma
Net Fx = -1190 + (-9415.14) = (690)a *************
a = (-10605.14) / 690
a = -15.369768 m/s^2

My teacher said that I messed up at the part with the stars. He says that there shouldn't be a negative sign infrom of the Ff, force of air resistance.

Isn't frictional force a vector that points in the -x direction? Could somebody please explain this to me please? Does the frictional force of a tire point in the positive direction? And if yes, is this always true for tires? and lastly, are there other instances besides tires where this is the case? Thank you in advance ! :]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hey jehan4141

If the car is moving in +x then friction due to downward forces and air drag should act in -x

if this wasn't true and air drag should be in +x so we can design a car for which air drag>downward force friction and then that car will move on its own ... which is not possible

so air drag should be in -X IMO
ask your teacher again in case he told you this by mistake
 
thank you :) i will ask him again :D
 
In order for the car to accelerate in the +x direction, its tires must push back against the road surface, in the -x direction. The force that prevents the tire from slipping is the static friction. So the static friction must act in the +x direction (thus opposing the tire's backwards push in the road surface).
 
gneill said:
In order for the car to accelerate in the +x direction, its tires must push back against the road surface, in the -x direction. The force that prevents the tire from slipping is the static friction. So the static friction must act in the +x direction (thus opposing the tire's backwards push in the road surface).

OH MY GOD !

I forgot that tires are rolling ... Damn it that was a dumb mistake ...
______________

jehan, I am really sorry for the wrong answer ... :(

Thank you gneill for correcting me.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top