How Does Gauss' Law Apply to Infinite Planes with Different Charge Densities?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on applying Gauss' Law to find the electric field generated by two infinite parallel planes with surface charge densities. For part (a), it is established that the electric field is perpendicular to the planes due to symmetry, leading to a calculation of the electric field as E = σ/(2ε₀) above and below the planes. The electric field between the planes cancels out, resulting in zero electric field in that region. The user expresses uncertainty about their calculations and seeks verification. Overall, the application of Gauss' Law confirms the expected behavior of electric fields around charged infinite planes.
tony873004
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,753
Reaction score
143
I'm still not confident with these kinds of problems. Hopefully I got it right, but can someone double check my work? Thanks!

Two parallel, infinite planes are separated by a distance d. Find the electric field everywhere (a) if both planes carry a surface charge density \sigma and (b) if one plane has a charge density \sigma and the other - \sigma.

Here's my attempt. I'm only trying part (a) here.
The electric field is perpendicular to the planes because of symmetry. The components of the electric field parallel to the planes add to zero because of symmetry. Therefore, the electric field is perpendicular to the planes. So we can place a cylinder anywhere on the plane and use Gauss’ Law to compute the flux passing through the cylinder. The flux passing through the top of the cylinder will be half of the total flux.

24_40a.GIF


<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> \Phi _{total} = \Phi _{side} + \Phi _{top} + \Phi _{bottom} \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \Phi _{side} = 0{\rm{ because }}\overrightarrow E \bot {\rm{\hat n}} \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \Phi _{{\rm{top}}} = \overrightarrow {E_z } \cdot {\rm{\hat k}} \cdot {\rm{\hat n}} \cdot A,\,\,\,\,{\rm{\hat k}} \cdot {\rm{\hat n = 1 because the normal vector, \hat n, is in the direction \hat k}}{\rm{.}} \\ <br /> \Phi _{{\rm{top}}} = \overrightarrow {E_z } \cdot A \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \Phi _{{\rm{bottom}}} = - \overrightarrow {E_z } \cdot - {\rm{\hat k}} \cdot {\rm{\hat n}} \cdot A,\,\,\,\, - {\rm{\hat k}} \cdot {\rm{\hat n = }} - {\rm{1 because the normal vector, \hat n, is in direction }} - {\rm{\hat k}}{\rm{.}} \\ <br /> \Phi _{{\rm{bottom}}} = \overrightarrow {E_z } \cdot A \\ <br /> \\ <br /> \Phi _{total} = 2\overrightarrow {E_z } \cdot A = \frac{{Q_{enclosed} }}{{\varepsilon _0 }},\,{\rm{ }}Q_{enclosed} = \sigma A \\ <br /> \overrightarrow {E_z } \cdot = \frac{{\sigma }}{{2\varepsilon _0 }} \\ <br /> \overrightarrow {E_z } = \frac{\sigma }{{2\varepsilon _0 }} \\ <br /> \end{array}<br />

The electric field coming out of the top of the cylinder is half of the electric field coming out of the total cylinder. Therefore, the electric field above the top infinite plane is
<br /> \overrightarrow {E_z } = \frac{{\frac{\sigma }{{2\varepsilon _0 }}}}{2} = <br /> {\frac{\sigma }{{4\varepsilon _0 }}{\rm{,\hat k}}}<br />


Similarly, the electric field below the bottom infinite plane is
<br /> {\frac{\sigma }{{4\varepsilon _0 }}, - {\rm{\hat k}}}<br />

Between the planes, the electric field lines will cancel. Therefore there are no electric field lines between the planes.
24_40b.GIF
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I change my guess for the top and bottom. It should be twice as much as the field lines from the plates combine.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top