How Does Incident Angle Affect Two-Slit Interference Patterns?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the path length difference for rays emerging from two slits when a plane wave is incident at an angle of 30 degrees. The key points include determining the total path length difference in terms of the angles and wavelength, as well as identifying the angles for the central maximum and the first interference minimum. Participants express confusion about how the incident angle affects the interference pattern and the correct application of trigonometric relationships. The conversation emphasizes the need to account for the extra distance traveled by light entering the slits due to the angle of incidence. A diagram is suggested to clarify angle definitions and avoid confusion in calculations.
luijsu
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a plane wave (of wavelength λ) incident on a wall at an angle Φ = 30. There are two slits in the wall separated by a distance d=10λ. Each slit has width a<<λ. Rays emerging from the slits propagate to a distant screen where an interference/diffraction pattern may be seen.

a. For rays emerging from the slits at the angle θ, calculate the total path length difference in terms of θ, Φ, a, and λ

b. For what angle θ will we find the "central maximum"?

c. For what angle θ will we find the first interference minimum? Note: There will be a "first minimum" on each side of the central maximum. Find one of these.

Homework Equations



I'm not really sure. Maybe the equation for the intensity of a two-slit interference-diffraction pattern.

The Attempt at a Solution



The problem is, I have no idea what to make of a. I'm guessing for b and c, that I'm supposed to find the angles at which intensity will be a maximum and minimum, but I don't even have the path difference. I cannot figure out how the fact that the wave is incident affects the pattern.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
luijsu said:
I cannot figure out how the fact that the wave is incident affects the pattern.
What if the wave was normal to the wall (Φ = 0)? What would be the phase difference at the slits? (That's the usual situation.)

Since here the wave is incident at an angle, the light entering one slit had to travel an extra distance just in getting to the slits. Figure out that extra path length. (The rest of the analysis is standard for slit patterns.)
 
So, would the path difference just be 10λsinΦ + (10λ+a)sinθ? Is the trig right?
 
Last edited:
luijsu said:
So, would the path difference just be 10λsinΦ + (10λ+a)sinθ? Is the trig right?
That looks OK, assuming you define your angles with respect to the normal. (A diagram would help avoid confusion, since angles can be left or right of the normal.) But why did you add an "a" to one, but not the other? (I would just ignore the slit width for the purposes of finding the two-slit interference pattern.)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top