How Does Increasing the Diameter of a Manometer Affect Liquid Levels?

AI Thread Summary
Increasing the diameter of a manometer does not affect the height difference or individual heights of the liquid, as pressure, density, and gravity remain constant. The relationship defined by pressure equals density times gravity times height indicates that the individual heights will not change despite the increased diameter. The cross-sectional areas cancel out in the derivation of the equation, supporting this conclusion. Therefore, while the difference in height remains constant, the individual liquid levels do not fluctuate. This understanding is crucial for accurately interpreting manometer behavior in fluid dynamics.
greenfloss
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If the diameter of a manometer is increased, what effect will it have on height difference and individual heights of a liquid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please attempt this yourself.

I will just say this. What is the definiton of pressure?
 
I have attempted it myself. It was in a quiz in school! I want to know if my answer is right.

I stated that there was no change in the individual heights or the difference in heights since pressure= density*gravity*height and since pressure, density and gravity were constant, so was height. But I don't know whether saying that the individual water levels would not change was right.

Correct?
 
During the derivation of the equation the cross -sectional areas cancel out and so yes, you are correct.

When I say attempt it yourself, I mean show your working on the forums. How do we know what you've done at school?
 
I'm awfully sorry about that. Can I just check one thing: so you're saying that despite there being a certain amount of water, when the pressure diameter is increased, the water levels don't fluctuate at all?

I know their difference will remain at X. But will their individual water levels change.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
15
Views
5K
Back
Top