How Does Increasing the Frequency Affect Accuracy in a Circular Motion Lab?

AI Thread Summary
Increasing the frequency of the rubber stopper's revolution in a circular motion lab leads to decreased accuracy in measuring the frequency. As the stopper spins faster, it becomes challenging to count revolutions and time them precisely due to the rapid motion. The operator's hand movement, which has the same period as the stopper, complicates observation, making it harder to focus on the stopper itself. Additionally, while the tension force must balance the weight of the stopper, the angle of the string remains constant despite increased speed. Overall, higher frequencies result in greater difficulty in achieving accurate measurements.
msimard8
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
This is a question pertaining to a lab we did. Ill try to describe it the best i can. What we pratically did was attach a rubber stopper to an end of a string, put the string to a hollow tube (like a torn apart pen), and tied a mass on the bottom. We had to hold on the tube and start swinging the rubber stopper horizontally by rotating the tube. The mass tied to the string caused a tension force. It is impossible to have the stopper on the string spinning perfectly horizontal because perpindicular forces are independent of each other. We then had to calculate the frequency of the stopper while changing some variables.

Here is my question,

For the greatest accuracy in this investigation, the tension force acting on the tsopper should be horizontal. In this context, what happens to the accuracy as the frequency of revolution of the stopper increases (with the other variables held constant)?


i said as the frequency increases, the accuracy decreases, but i don't know how to explain why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh, i did a very similar lab to this one. Anyways, your answers is correct and i think it is so because as the stopper spins faster, it gets harder to count the revolutions and stop the timer at the exact time of the revolution occurring.
 
To make the stopper rotate you need to wave your hand to and fro. This motion will have the same period as that of the stopper. It is much easier to watch the motion of the operator's hand than to try and see what the stopper is doing (which is moving too quickly to see - the eye has great difficulty in focussing on it). It becomes much more difficult to count the revolutions as the speed increases.

Yes, you are correct in thinking that the tension will point a bit upwards. The vertical component need to balance the weight of the stopper while the horizontal component supplies the centripetal force.

The angle of the string below the horizontal should not increase with speed since the needed vertical component of the tension need not increase at a greater radius (weight of the stopper stays the same). The stopper will swing at a lower height though at a greater radius.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top