How Does Inserting a Dielectric Material Affect Capacitor Charge?

AI Thread Summary
Inserting a dielectric material into a parallel-plate capacitor increases its capacitance, allowing more charge to flow from the battery while maintaining the same voltage. The initial capacitance for the vacuum-insulated capacitor was calculated to be 7.29e-9 F, while the capacitance with the dielectric became 3.5e-8 F. The charge on the plates with the dielectric was found to be 1.75e-6 C, compared to the vacuum-insulated charge of 3.64e-7 C. The additional charge flowing from the battery was initially miscalculated due to errors in determining the capacitance. Correcting these calculations is essential for finding the accurate additional charge.
kopinator
Messages
41
Reaction score
1
A parallel-plate air capacitor of area A= 21.0 cm2 and plate separation d= 3.20 mm is charged by a battery to a voltage 50.0 V. If a dielectric material with κ = 4.80 is inserted so that it fills the volume between the plates (with the capacitor still connected to the battery), how much additional charge will flow from the battery onto the positive plate?

C= ε0A/d
Q=C(dV)
C= κC_0_
Q= κQ_0_

Using the first equation, I found the capacitance for the vacuum-insulated capacitor. Then I found the change in capacitance using C=κC_0_. I got C_0_(vacuum-insulated capacitance) to be 7.29e-9 F and got C(dielectric-insulated capacitance) to 3.5e-8. I know that while the capacitor is hooked up to the battery, the potential difference(dV) does not change. So I used Q= C(dV) to find the charge on the plates with dielectric in between which was 1.75e-6 C. I also found the Q_0_(vacuum-insulated charge) to be 3.64e-7 C. I took the difference of the two and got 1.38e-6 C. I thought this was the answer but it was wrong. The problem asks, "how much additional charge will flow from the battery onto the positive plate?" though. I feel I'm missing something but I don't know what.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like you understand the problem very clearly.
But there may be something wrong with the capacitance calcs:
I get C = ε₀A/d = 8.854E-12*21E-4 / 3.2E-3 = 5.81 E-12
which is more than a thousand times smaller than your value.
Mind you, I'm struggling a bit with calculations these days.
 
I think i figured out my problem. My was miscalculating my ε_0_ but I got it now. Thank you!
 
Most welcome!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top