How Does Lenz's Law Apply to EMF in a Triaxially Bent Wire?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electromotive force (emf) in a triaxially bent wire subjected to a changing magnetic field. The wire consists of three circular segments, each a quadrant of a circle, with a uniform magnetic field directed along the positive x-axis. Participants clarify the application of Faraday's law and Lenz's law, emphasizing that the area can be treated as constant for the calculation. The projected area for the magnetic flux is confirmed to be πr²/4, and the rate of change of the magnetic field (dB/dt) is provided. The final approach involves calculating the emf by multiplying the projected area by dB/dt for each segment and summing the results.
ghetto_bird25
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A wire is bent into three circular segments each of radius r=9.2 cm. each segment is a quadrant of circle, ab lying in the xy plane, bc, in the yz plane, and ca lying in the zx plane. If a uniform magnetic field points in the positive x direction, what is in volts the magnitude of the emf developed in the wire when B increases at the rate of 3.4 mT/s?
http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs1141/art/images/c31/nw0500-n.gif


Homework Equations


so what i used was faraday's law and lenz's law by using the formula
\epsilon=d(B A)/dt
and then since area (A) is constant you can bring it out. and area would equal 1/4\pir^{2} and the dB/dt is given. the only problem is that i don't know what to do with the components as you have the pieces on all three axis and how wood i deal with each component?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are no components for the EMF. Your projected area seems right.
Just multiply A and dB/dt.
 
oh so jus do it for each section and add it up or make it 3/4pi*r^2 time dB/dt
 
No. The projected area area for the flux is just the pi*r^2/4.
 
oh ok thanks alot
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top