How Does Mass Distribution Affect the Center of Mass in a Triangle?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the center of mass of a triangle with uneven mass distribution. The initial approach involved drawing a horizontal line through two equal masses, leading to an incorrect calculation of the center of mass. A more accurate method was proposed, using a coordinate system and the formula for the center of mass, which resulted in a different answer. The final distance from point Q was calculated to be approximately 5.36 cm, correcting the earlier miscalculation. This highlights the importance of considering relative masses in determining the center of mass in non-uniform distributions.
jono90one
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I know traditionally the center of mass of a triangle is 2/3 the way down its height, but i believe it varies here due to the uneven mass distribution.
Here i have to find the center of mass distance from Q

http://img508.imageshack.us/f/scn0001p.jpg/

Here is an image of my working


Homework Equations



N/a

The Attempt at a Solution



See image.
Incase its unlegiable, i come to a conclusion that the that the center of mass is at h/2-(h/2 x 0.2). In other words if you drew a horizontal line through the two 50g's you'd get the center of mass just below that.

Im hopnig my idea of drawing an imaginary horizontal line is a way to approach it seeming the vertices are the same.
By doing this i get an answer (From Q!) of:
h - 2sqrt (3) = sqrt(75)-2sqrt(3) = 3sqrt(3)

Is this correct? Or is my "Horizontal line" idea not valid.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer isn't correct. For one thing, you're not taking into account the relative masses of the two triangles. Also, it appears you're trying to calculate the location of the center of mass of the second triangle and got 20% of its height. Think about if the bottom mass were 50 g instead of 20 g, so the second triangle is uniform. Does the formula you used give you the right answer?
 
Ok I'm going to use a method i know works rather than a short cut (I don't know the actual answer):
Here's my working:
http://img600.imageshack.us/f/scn0002n.jpg/
I'm basically creating a coordinate system, then using;
M(x', y')= m1(x1,y1) + m2(x2,y2) + ...

This gives my the center of mass location which comes out as (0, -25/21) [This is cut off at the end]

Hence distance from Q is h/2 + magnitude of this answer (i.e. positive)
= sqrt(75)/2 + 25/21
= 5.52 (3sf)

So the above attempt was wrong as you said.

Is this correct?
 
Your method sounds correct, but your final answer isn't. I got 5.36 cm.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top