How Does Measuring Voltage Before and After an Experiment Impact Uncertainty?

AI Thread Summary
Measuring voltage before and after an experiment can reveal variations due to factors like resistor temperature changes, rather than indicating voltmeter uncertainty. The recorded voltages of 1.516 before and 1.498 after suggest potential changes in circuit conditions rather than a change in voltmeter resistance. This highlights that differences in measurements may stem from circuit behavior rather than the voltmeter's accuracy. Understanding these variations is crucial for accurately assessing measurement uncertainty. Therefore, this method is not effective for determining voltmeter uncertainty.
Crovati
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
How does taking the voltage of a circuit before and after an experiment help with uncertainty in the voltmeter?
Our teacher instructed us to do this, and i got that voltage before was 1.516 and voltage after was 1.498.
Does this mean the voltmeter became less resistant? How do I turn this into an uncertainty?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is NOT a good way to figure out the uncertainty in a voltmeter.

There is no answer to the question as you have posed it. For example, a particular circuit might well have resistors that change values slightly as they warm up and so the voltage in a particular part of that circuit could have different values when the circuit is cold than when it has been warmed up. This would have nothing to do with any measurement uncertainty in the voltmeter, although it would change what you see as that uncertainty since you wouldn't know whether difference is measurements were due to the voltmeter or the changes in resistance values.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top