How does one get time dilation, length contraction, and E=mc^2 from spacetime metric?

RelativeQuant
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
How does one get time dilation, length contraction, and E=mc^2 from the spacetime metric?

Suppose all that you are given is x12 + x22 + x32 - c2t2 = s2

How do you derive time dilation, length contraction, and E=mc^2 from this?

What is the most direct way to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should take a look at Spacetime Physics, by Taylor and Wheeler, where this is all covered. It's only about 100 pages.
 
Thanks! Is there a quick answer of any resources on the web? Thanks! :)
 
RelativeQuant said:
How do you derive time dilation, length contraction, and E=mc^2 from this?
What is the most direct way to do this?

Start with time dilation. The squared distance between (0,0,0,0) and (T,vT,0,0) must equal the squared distance between (0,0,0,0) and (T',0,0,0) because it's the same interval between the same two points, namely the endpoints of a journey taken at speed ##v## as viewed by the traveller (primed coordinates) and an observer moving at speed ##v## relative to the traveller (unprimed coordinates). Use the metric to calculate the squared distances, equate them, and solve for the ratio of T' to T.
 
RelativeQuant said:
OK I found a concise way to derive time dilation & length contraction from the spacetime metric:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introd...contractions:_more_on_Lorentz_transformations

Does anyone know how to derive E=mc^2 from time dilation and/or length contraction? Or from the spacetime metric?

Thanks! :)
This is not a simple. I don't think it can really be derived from the metric alone. You need to bring in, for example, energy and momentum conservation. Then, what you end up deriving from this plus the metric is E2 - p2c2 = m2c4 (once you have the right prior motivation, this just says that the 4-norm of m * 4-velocity unit vector is m, which is trivially true). When momentum is zero, you have the special case E=mc2.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top