How does one get time dilation, length contraction, and E=mc^2 from spacetime metric?

RelativeQuant
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
How does one get time dilation, length contraction, and E=mc^2 from the spacetime metric?

Suppose all that you are given is x12 + x22 + x32 - c2t2 = s2

How do you derive time dilation, length contraction, and E=mc^2 from this?

What is the most direct way to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should take a look at Spacetime Physics, by Taylor and Wheeler, where this is all covered. It's only about 100 pages.
 
Thanks! Is there a quick answer of any resources on the web? Thanks! :)
 
RelativeQuant said:
How do you derive time dilation, length contraction, and E=mc^2 from this?
What is the most direct way to do this?

Start with time dilation. The squared distance between (0,0,0,0) and (T,vT,0,0) must equal the squared distance between (0,0,0,0) and (T',0,0,0) because it's the same interval between the same two points, namely the endpoints of a journey taken at speed ##v## as viewed by the traveller (primed coordinates) and an observer moving at speed ##v## relative to the traveller (unprimed coordinates). Use the metric to calculate the squared distances, equate them, and solve for the ratio of T' to T.
 
RelativeQuant said:
OK I found a concise way to derive time dilation & length contraction from the spacetime metric:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introd...contractions:_more_on_Lorentz_transformations

Does anyone know how to derive E=mc^2 from time dilation and/or length contraction? Or from the spacetime metric?

Thanks! :)
This is not a simple. I don't think it can really be derived from the metric alone. You need to bring in, for example, energy and momentum conservation. Then, what you end up deriving from this plus the metric is E2 - p2c2 = m2c4 (once you have the right prior motivation, this just says that the 4-norm of m * 4-velocity unit vector is m, which is trivially true). When momentum is zero, you have the special case E=mc2.
 
Last edited:
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top