How Does Physics Influence Weather Forecasting Techniques?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bre.howard624
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Weather
AI Thread Summary
Physics plays a crucial role in weather forecasting by informing meteorologists about atmospheric dynamics, thermodynamics, and fluid mechanics. Key concepts include the behavior of air masses, the principles of heat transfer, and the physics of precipitation formation. Understanding these principles helps in accurately measuring variables like temperature, pressure, and humidity. Additionally, advanced forecasting techniques rely on mathematical models that simulate weather patterns based on physical laws. Overall, a solid grasp of physics is essential for effective weather prediction.
bre.howard624
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Physics in the Weather?

Homework Statement



It isn't a crazy physics problem or anything I just have to list some of the things that are related to physics in weather forecasting. THe actual question is "what are some things weathermen need to know regarding physics?" I looked around and I couldn't find any information specific enough and when I did I only found a couple things like measuring rain and temperature and what not. I was just wondering if anyone could give me a more detailed list! THanks!



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You might like this link:
http://isccp.giss.nasa.gov/climanal8.html
 
Try this: http://www.shorstmeyer.com/msj/geo165/ClimateVol1.pdf

Just browsing will make your head spin.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
52
Views
909
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top