How Does Plaque Constriction Affect Blood Velocity in Arteries?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effect of plaque constriction on blood velocity in arteries, specifically analyzing a scenario with a partially blocked artery. Given an artery radius of 3 mm reduced to 2 mm due to plaque, the average blood velocity in the constricted region is 0.5 m/s, while the average velocity in the unobstructed region is calculated to be 0.22 m/s. Participants express confusion over the flow rates, noting that the flow rate in the larger vessel should not be less than in the obstructed portion, and seek clarification on the calculations involved. The conversation references the Hagen-Poiseuille equation and the principle of flow continuity, emphasizing the relationship between area and radius in determining velocity. The complexities of changing velocities and pressure in the system are acknowledged, indicating the challenges in maintaining consistent parameters.
semitope
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An artery with a 3 mm radius is partially blocked with plaque. In the constricted region the effective radius is 2 mm and the average blood velocity is 0.5 m/s. What is the average velocity in the unobstructed region? Assume no changes to η, L, and ΔP. Ans; 0.22 m/s

Homework Equations



Flow rate = ΔP(π/8)(1/η)(R^4/L)
= (PA– PB)(π/8)(1/η)(R^4/L)


The Attempt at a Solution



rate = [(ΔPπ)/8ηL] * R^4

Turned the middle section into x and solved for x. then used x to get the flow rate with a diameter of 3mm. I got something around 2.5m/s. Doesn't seem right, but at the same time the answer given by the professor doesn't seem right either. the flow rate in the larger vessel is less than that in the obstructed portion if that answer is correct. If the 0.22 is correct I'd love an explanation of how it is solved
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rho1*A1*V1=rho2*A2*V2 which is basic flow continuity

Therefore V2=(A1/A2)*V1

Area is proportional to square of radius.
 
Thanks. Would what I was doing have worked if the systems were separate with the same parameters but different radii?
 
You have the Hagen-Poiseuille equation that relates pressure drop to discharge in a circular tube of length L for laminar flow. The problem is that whenever the velocity changes, the pressure changes so parameters do not remain the same.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top