How Does Plaque Constriction Affect Blood Velocity in Arteries?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the effect of plaque constriction on blood velocity in arteries, specifically analyzing a scenario with a partially blocked artery. Given an artery radius of 3 mm reduced to 2 mm due to plaque, the average blood velocity in the constricted region is 0.5 m/s, while the average velocity in the unobstructed region is calculated to be 0.22 m/s. Participants express confusion over the flow rates, noting that the flow rate in the larger vessel should not be less than in the obstructed portion, and seek clarification on the calculations involved. The conversation references the Hagen-Poiseuille equation and the principle of flow continuity, emphasizing the relationship between area and radius in determining velocity. The complexities of changing velocities and pressure in the system are acknowledged, indicating the challenges in maintaining consistent parameters.
semitope
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An artery with a 3 mm radius is partially blocked with plaque. In the constricted region the effective radius is 2 mm and the average blood velocity is 0.5 m/s. What is the average velocity in the unobstructed region? Assume no changes to η, L, and ΔP. Ans; 0.22 m/s

Homework Equations



Flow rate = ΔP(π/8)(1/η)(R^4/L)
= (PA– PB)(π/8)(1/η)(R^4/L)


The Attempt at a Solution



rate = [(ΔPπ)/8ηL] * R^4

Turned the middle section into x and solved for x. then used x to get the flow rate with a diameter of 3mm. I got something around 2.5m/s. Doesn't seem right, but at the same time the answer given by the professor doesn't seem right either. the flow rate in the larger vessel is less than that in the obstructed portion if that answer is correct. If the 0.22 is correct I'd love an explanation of how it is solved
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rho1*A1*V1=rho2*A2*V2 which is basic flow continuity

Therefore V2=(A1/A2)*V1

Area is proportional to square of radius.
 
Thanks. Would what I was doing have worked if the systems were separate with the same parameters but different radii?
 
You have the Hagen-Poiseuille equation that relates pressure drop to discharge in a circular tube of length L for laminar flow. The problem is that whenever the velocity changes, the pressure changes so parameters do not remain the same.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top