How Does Polarization Affect Electric Fields in Spherical Objects?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KeyToMyFire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field
KeyToMyFire
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
ρ

Homework Statement



A sphere of radius a has a radial polarization P = krn\hat{r} where k and n are constants and n \geq 0.

a.) Find the volume and surface charge densities of bound charge.

b.) Find E outside and inside the sphere. Verify that you results for E satisfy the appropiate boundary conditions.

c.) Find V (potential) outside and inside the sphere.

d.) Sketch the results.

Homework Equations



σb = P \cdot \hat{n}

ρb = -\nabla \cdot P

The Attempt at a Solution



I got

σb = krn

and

ρb = -(n+2)krn-1

which I'm pretty sure is right, but then for E I get

Einside = -krn\hat{r}0

which seems okay and then

Eoutside = 0

which doesn't seem right.Can anybody tell if this is right or not? And if not how to do it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think everything is correct, except you need to specify a specific value of r in your expression for σb.

To see if it's reasonable that E = 0 outside the sphere, calculate the net charge of the sphere due to both the bound volume charge density and the bound surface charge density.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top