How Does Relativistic Force Affect the Movement and Speed of a Mass?

six7th
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a) A mass m starts at rest. Starting at t = 0 (measured in the lab frame), you apply a constant force f to it (lab frame). How long (in the lab frame) does it take for the mass to move a distance x (also measured in the lab frame)? Check that your answer makes sense in the non-relativistic limit.

After a very long time, the speed of the mass m will approach c. It turns out that it approaches c sufficiently fast so that after a very long time, the mass will remain (approximately, asymptotically) a constant distance (as measured in the lab frame) behind a photon that was emitted at t = 0 from the starting position of the mass. What is this distance?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



a) The force on the mass is given by F = \frac{dP}{dt}, Integrating w.r.t to time we get:

Ft = P

Using relativistic momentum this is:

Ft = \gamma mv

Now solving for t:

t= \frac{\gamma m v}{F}

I'm not really sure where to go from here. Do I express v as dx/dt and then integrate, which is complicated as \gamma is also a function of v.

Edit: Ok I tried solving for v instead and end up with:

v = \frac{Ftc}{\sqrt{c^2m^2+F^2t^2}}

Using v = dx/dt and solving for x(t):

x(t) = \frac{c\sqrt{c^2m^2+F^2t^2}}{F}

Squaring both sides gives and rearranging

(\frac{Fx(t)}{c})^2 = m^2c^2+F^2t^2

Not sure this helps with the question but I noticed that the energy of the object is just the work done, Fx(t), and the momentum is F*t. Using this we get

(\frac{E}{c})^2 = m^2c^2+p^2
E^2 = m^2c^4+p^2c^2

As this is the invariant does this show that it makes sense in a non relativistic limit?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks good. What do you get when you integrate that?
 
Sorry I accidentally clicked post before I finished typing everything up. The main post has been updated with how far I've got.
 
You're getting there, but you need to include the constant of integration and apply initial conditions or, equivalently, use definite integrals. Note that with your result, when t=0, x isn't 0.

I think it makes things a bit clearer if you pull out the factor of (mc)^2 to get everything in terms of the dimensionless quantity Ft/mc:
$$\int_0^x dx = c\int_0^t \frac{\frac{Ft}{mc}}{\sqrt{1+\left(\frac{Ft}{mc}\right)^2}}\,dt = \frac{mc^2}{F}\left.\sqrt{1+\left(\frac{Ft}{mc}\right)^2}\right|_0^t = \dots$$ In the non-relativistic limit, the imparted impulse Ft is much less than mc.
 
Thanks, I wrongly assumed the constants would be 0 because the object started at rest and I didn't think to check my result matched the initial conditions!

Ok, so after finding the constant I get:

x(t) = \frac{mc^2}{F}\sqrt{1+(\frac{Ft}{mc})^2} - \frac{mc^2}{F} = \frac{mc^2}{F}(\sqrt{1+(\frac{Ft}{mc})^2} -1)

Rearranging for t:

t = ±\sqrt{\frac{v^2}{c^2}+\frac{2mx}{F}}

Which reduces to what we expect in the non-relativistic limit!

So for part b),

x(t) = \frac{mc^2}{F}(\sqrt{1+(\frac{Ft}{mc})^2} -1)

I'm thinking I should take the limit t → ∞ and then subtract this from the distance traveled by a photon cΔt, although surely the distance just goes to infinity as t → ∞.
 
Just assume ##t## is large, not infinite.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top