MHB How does Remmert derive the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality in complex functions?

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Reinhold Remmert's book "Theory of Complex Functions" ...

I am focused on Chapter 0: Complex Numbers and Continuous Functions ... and in particular on Section 1.3: Scalar Product and Absolute Value ... ...

I need help in order to fully understand Remmert's derivation of the Cauchy-Schwartz Inequality ...

The start of Remmert's section on Scalar Product and Absolute Value reads as follows:

View attachment 8545

In the above text by Remmert we read the following:

" ... ... Routine calculations immediately reveal the identity

$$ \langle w, z \rangle^2 + \langle i w, z \rangle^2 = \mid w \mid^2 \mid z \mid^2$$ for all $$w,z \in \mathbb{C} $$

which contains as a special case the

Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality

$$\mid \langle w, z \rangle \mid \le \mid w \mid \mid z \mid$$ ... ...

... ... ... "
Now ... although it doesn't quite ft the language of a "special case" ...

... if $$\langle i w, z \rangle^2 \ge 0$$ ... then ... we could argue that ...$$\langle w, z \rangle^2 \le \mid w \mid^2 \mid z \mid^2$$ ... ...Is that the right move?... BUT ... can we be sure that ..

... $$\langle i w, z \rangle^2 = (v^2 x^2 - 2uxvy + u^2 y^2 ) \ge 0 $$ where we have $$w = u + iv$$ and $$z = x + iy$$ ...

... We have to worry that it might be the case that $$2uxvy \gt (v^2 x^2 + u^2 y^2 )$$ ...

... problem with suggested move above! ...Can some please clarify ... and indicate how to show that

$$\langle w, z \rangle^2 + \langle i w, z \rangle^2 = \mid w \mid^2 \mid z \mid^2$$

$$\Longrightarrow \mid \langle w, z \rangle \mid \le \mid w \mid \mid z \mid$$ ... ...
Hope that someone can help ...

Peter
 

Attachments

  • Remmert - Scalar Product and Absolute Value - Section 1.3, Ch. 0  ... .png
    Remmert - Scalar Product and Absolute Value - Section 1.3, Ch. 0 ... .png
    23.5 KB · Views: 125
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
can we be sure that ..

... $$\langle i w, z \rangle^2 = (v^2 x^2 - 2uxvy + u^2 y^2 ) \ge 0 $$ where we have $$w = u + iv$$ and $$z = x + iy$$ ...

... We have to worry that it might be the case that $$2uxvy \gt (v^2 x^2 + u^2 y^2 )$$ ...
The inner product $\langle w,z\rangle$ is by definition real, so its square must necessarily be positive (or zero). In fact, $$\langle i w, z \rangle^2 = (v^2 x^2 - 2uxvy + u^2 y^2 ) = (vx-uy)^2 \geqslant 0 $$.
 
Opalg said:
The inner product $\langle w,z\rangle$ is by definition real, so its square must necessarily be positive (or zero). In fact, $$\langle i w, z \rangle^2 = (v^2 x^2 - 2uxvy + u^2 y^2 ) = (vx-uy)^2 \geqslant 0 $$.
Thanks for the help, Opalg ...

Peter
 
Opalg said:
The inner product $\langle w,z\rangle$ is by definition real, so its square must necessarily be positive (or zero). In fact, $$\langle i w, z \rangle^2 = (v^2 x^2 - 2uxvy + u^2 y^2 ) = (vx-uy)^2 \geqslant 0 $$.

I have just become aware that the argument:

$$ \langle w, z \rangle^2 + \langle i w, z \rangle^2 = \ \mid w \mid^2 \mid z \mid^2$$ for all $$w,z \in \mathbb{C} $$

$$\Longrightarrow$$ $$\langle w, z \rangle^2 \le \ \mid w \mid^2 \mid z \mid^2$$

$$\Longrightarrow$$ $$\langle w, z \rangle \ \le \ \mid w \mid \mid z \mid$$does not show that $$\mid \langle w, z \rangle \mid \ \le \ \mid w \mid \mid z \mid $$

... since

... ... $$\mid \langle w, z \rangle \mid \ \le \ \mid w \mid \mid z \mid$$

$$\Longrightarrow - \mid w \mid \mid z \mid \ \le \ \mid \langle w, z \rangle \mid \ \le \ \mid w \mid \mid z \mid$$... so ... effectively we have only shown "half" of the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality ...Can someone please demonstrate a full proof of the inequality ... preferably demonstrating that $$- \mid w \mid \mid z \mid \ \le \ \mid \langle w, z \rangle \mid$$ ...Peter
 
Last edited:
Peter said:
I have just become aware that the argument:

$$ \langle w, z \rangle^2 + \langle i w, z \rangle^2 = \ \mid w \mid^2 \mid z \mid^2$$ for all $$w,z \in \mathbb{C} $$

$$\Longrightarrow$$ $$\langle w, z \rangle^2 \le \ \mid w \mid^2 \mid z \mid^2$$

$$\Longrightarrow$$ $$\langle w, z \rangle \ \le \ \mid w \mid \mid z \mid$$does not show that $$\mid \langle w, z \rangle \mid \ \le \ \mid w \mid \mid z \mid $$

... since

... ... $$\mid \langle w, z \rangle \mid \ \le \ \mid w \mid \mid z \mid$$

$$\Longrightarrow - \mid w \mid \mid z \mid \ \le \ \mid \langle w, z \rangle \mid \ \le \ \mid w \mid \mid z \mid$$... so ... effectively we have only shown "half" of the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality ...Can someone please demonstrate a full proof of the inequality ... preferably demonstrating that $$- \mid w \mid \mid z \mid \ \le \ \mid \langle w, z \rangle \mid$$ ...
If $a$ and $b$ are real numbers, then $a^2\leqslant b^2$ always implies $|a|\leqslant |b|$ (because $(-a)^2 = a^2 = |a|^2$).

In this case, if $\langle w,z\rangle^2 \leqslant |w|^2|z|^2$, then taking the positive square root of both sides it follows that $|\langle w,z\rangle| \leqslant |w||z|$.
 
A sphere as topological manifold can be defined by gluing together the boundary of two disk. Basically one starts assigning each disk the subspace topology from ##\mathbb R^2## and then taking the quotient topology obtained by gluing their boundaries. Starting from the above definition of 2-sphere as topological manifold, shows that it is homeomorphic to the "embedded" sphere understood as subset of ##\mathbb R^3## in the subspace topology.
Back
Top