How Does Rolling Affect the Speed and Time of a Sphere Down an Incline?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics_geek
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angular
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a solid sphere rolling down an incline versus sliding down without rolling. For the rolling case, the total energy at the bottom combines translational and rotational energy, leading to a speed of v = sqrt(10gh/7). In contrast, for the sliding case, the speed is v = sqrt(2gh), which is higher since it only accounts for translational kinetic energy. The time intervals to reach the bottom differ, with the rolling sphere taking longer due to its lower speed. Overall, rolling affects both the speed and time taken to descend an incline compared to sliding.
physics_geek
Messages
82
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid sphere is released from height h from the top of an incline making an angle θ with the horizontal.
(a) Calculate the speed of the sphere when it reaches the bottom of the incline in the case that it rolls without slipping. (Use g,h, and theta for θ as necessary.)
(b) Calculate the speed of the sphere when it reaches the bottom of the incline in the case that it slides frictionlessly without rolling. (Use g,h, and theta for θ as necessary.)
(c) Compare the time intervals required to reach the bottom in cases (a) and (b).
rolling time/sliding time =

Homework Equations


no idea


The Attempt at a Solution


again no idea..any helpful starts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can do questions like this using forces and accelerations, but it is MUCH easier to do them with energy formulas. Basically,
Energy at top = energy at bottom
PE at top = KE at bottom + rotational energy at bottom

With that start, you can't go wrong - begin by putting in the detailed formula for each kind of energy.
 
yea thanks a lot!
i think i got it
 
Let's answer b) first. The total kinetic energy at the bottom is mgh, independent of theta. When the sliding ball reaches the bottom, mgh = (0.5)mv^2, and v=sqr(2gh).
Let's answer a) now. Again the total energy is mgh. However now, the potential energy has been converted to both energy of translation (0.5)mv^2 AND energy of rotation. Because the moment of inertia of a uniformly dense sphere is (2/5)mr^2, the energy of rotation is
(1/5)m(r^2)(dtheta/dt)^2 = (1/5)mv^2. So when the ball rolls without slipping, the kinetic energy at the bottom is mgh = (1/2 + 1/5)mv^2 = (7/10)mv^2, and so now v=sqr(10gh/7). So now the translational velocity is lower.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top