How Does Statistical Mechanics Predict the Expectation Value in Quantum States?

BOAS
Messages
546
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement



I am having trouble connecting the expectation value of ##\hat a^\dagger \hat a## to the prediction from statistical mechanics for the state $$\hat \rho = \sum_n \frac{\bar n^n}{(1 + \bar n)^{n+1}} |n\rangle \langle n|$$

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
from statistical mechanics, we have that ##\bar n = \frac{1}{e^{\beta \hbar \omega} -1}## and so I try to compute this by taking ##\langle \hat a^\dagger \hat a \rangle##.

$$\langle\hat n\rangle = Tr(\rho \hat n)$$

$$\langle \hat n \rangle = Tr(\sum_n \frac{\bar n^n}{(1 + \bar n)^{n+1}} |n\rangle \langle n| \hat n)$$

$$\langle \hat n \rangle = \sum_n \frac{\bar n^n}{(1 + \bar n)^{n+1}}\langle n| \hat n |n\rangle$$

$$\langle \hat n \rangle = \sum_n \frac{n \bar n^n}{(1 + \bar n)^{n+1}}$$

I am unsure of where to go from here, or if I am approaching this in the correct manner.

Am I supposed to be able to evaluate this sum?

Edit - So I typed this into mathematica and found that the sum does indeed converge to ##\bar n##. I suppose my question is really, how should I go about evaluating this sum?

Thank you for any help you can give
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This thread can be closed, I have solved it.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top